GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › SalesTools.io · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

SalesTools.io

10Judge labels
5First choices
1Negative labels
6 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
7% in AI SDR for mid-market buyers
Rank 4 of 71 in the mid-market standing
1 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 17% of its 6 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In ai sdr · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named SalesTools.io for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
AI SDR agentsSales7%4 of 7117%6under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 20%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for SalesTools.io yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated SalesTools.io across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00011
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00101
Kimi K210001
GLM 4.7 FlashX01001
MiniMax M2.520002

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labels2
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained8 labels3
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative10 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Amplemarket or SalesTools.io appear to be the strongest choices based on current reviews” MiniMax M2.5 · AI SDR · direct prompt · first choice
“SalesTools.io - Best Overall Value (~$97/month)” MiniMax M2.5 · AI SDR · budget prompt · first choice
“1. SalesTools.io — *Best Overall Value*” Kimi K2 · AI SDR · budget prompt · first choice
“Best All-Rounder: SalesTools.io - From $97/month” GLM 4.7 FlashX · AI SDR · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“For true AI SDR, the entry point is actually higher ($750+/month).” DeepSeek V4 Flash · AI SDR · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SalesTools.io, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SalesTools.io was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Agent Frank7 of 101Not in the top three
AiSDR5 of 101Not in the top three
OpenClaw5 of 100Not in the top three
Instantly4 of 100Not in the top three
LeadLoft4 of 100Not in the top three
11x3 of 100Not in the top three
Apollo.io3 of 100Not in the top three
Jeeva3 of 100Not in the top three
eesier2 of 101Not in the top three
Artisan2 of 100Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SalesTools.io's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SalesTools.io, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at the vendor's own domain is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack