GTM AI Index

Index › Vendors › Jeeva · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Jeeva

10Judge labels

3First choices

0Negative labels

6 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

5 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Jeeva was named 5 times in AI SDR, where Apollo.io led with 20%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business11 of 79

under the label threshold

Mid-market7 of 71

under the label threshold

Enterprise51 of 60

under the label threshold

In ai sdr · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Jeeva for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
AI SDR agents	Sales	4%	7 of 71	0%	5	under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 20%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Jeeva yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Jeeva across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained8 labels3

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative10 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Go with eesier (for zero-setup outbound) or Jeeva AI (if you want to work out of your existing Gmail/Outlook)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · AI SDR · budget prompt · first choice

“or Jeeva if you want the cheapest *more autonomous* AI SDR style tool” Perplexity Sonar · AI SDR · budget prompt · first choice

“Strong budget alternatives (<$100/mo entry) ... Jeeva AI | Free; $95/mo (Growth)” Grok 4.1 Fast · AI SDR · budget prompt · alternative

“Very affordable entry point with real autonomous capabilities.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · AI SDR · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Jeeva, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Jeeva was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Apollo.io8 of 101Not in the top three

Agent Frank7 of 101Not in the top three

Artisan6 of 100Not in the top three

AiSDR5 of 100Not in the top three

11x4 of 100Not in the top three

SalesTools.io3 of 102Not in the top three

Instantly3 of 100Not in the top three

OpenClaw3 of 100Not in the top three

SalesRobot2 of 100Not in the top three

Smartlead2 of 100Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Jeeva. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 10 answers that named Jeeva and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

amplemarket.com2

artisan.co2

clay.com2

lindy.ai2

salesforge.ai2

toolradar.com2

ventureharbour.com2

aisdr.com1

apollo.io1

cryptopolitan.com1

Seventeen of the seventeen domain citations in answers naming Jeeva came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

amplemarket.com/blog/best-ai-sales-agents2

artisan.co/blog/the-best-ai-sdrs2

clay.com/guides/best/ai-sdr-tools2

toolradar.com/guides/best-ai-sdr-tools2

ventureharbour.com/best-ai-sales-tools2

aisdr.com/blog/best-ai-sales-assistant1

apollo.io/insights/whats-the-best-ai-sdr-tool-for-a-startup-that-cant-afford-to-hire-multi1

cryptopolitan.com/best-ai-sdr-sales-tools1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Jeeva

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Jeeva; a claim can dispute any of them.

Jeeva AI 4

The company

Jeeva AI is the company behind Jeeva.

Website: jeeva.ai
Headquarters: United States

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Jeeva's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Jeeva, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at jeeva.ai is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.