GTM AI Index

Index › Products › Romify · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Romify

4Judge labels

1First choices

1Negative labels

3 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

2 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Romify was named 2 times in Event lead capture, where Blinq led with 23%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business45 of 70

under the label threshold

Mid-market24 of 70

under the label threshold

Enterprise46 of 75

under the label threshold

In event lead capture · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Romify for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Event lead capture apps	Marketing	2%	24 of 70	50%	2	under 10 labels · led by Blinq at 23%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Romify yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Romify across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase4 labels1

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative4 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Romify is the best event badge scanning app for mid-market and enterprise B2B teams attending 10 or more events annually” Muse Glimmer 30B · Event lead capture · paraphrase prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Enterprise skew; less proven for mid-market badge retrieval.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Event lead capture · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Romify, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Romify was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Captello3 of 41Not among the top eight

Cvent LeadCapture2 of 41Not among the top eight

Blinq2 of 40Not among the top eight

momencio2 of 40Not among the top eight

Booth IQ1 of 41Not among the top eight

Mobly Capture1 of 41Not among the top eight

Bizzabo1 of 40Not among the top eight

Eventleaf Lead Retrieval App1 of 40Not among the top eight

Expo Pass1 of 40Not among the top eight

Wave1 of 40Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Romify. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 4 answers that named Romify and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

eventsair.com4

romify.ioYour site4

blinq.me3

eventify.io3

g2.com3

mobilocard.com3

wavecnct.com3

zuddl.com3

b2brain.com2

bizzabo.com2

Twenty-six of the thirty domain citations in answers naming Romify came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

eventsair.com/blog/best-lead-retrieval-app-for-trade-shows4

blinq.me/blog/best-trade-show-lead-capture-apps3

eventify.io/blog/best-lead-retrieval-software3

mobilocard.com/post/whats-the-best-event-lead-generation-software3

romify.io/blog/event-badge-scanning-app3

wavecnct.com/blogs/best-badge-scanner-tradeshow3

zuddl.com/blog/top-9-trade-show-lead-capture-apps3

b2brain.com/blogs/badge-scanning-app2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

romify.io ranks 6 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Romify takes 2% of first choices and Blinq takes 23%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “event lead capture app”

Position for “best event lead capture app”

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 24 of 70 in event lead capture

Segment leader

23%

Blinq

First choices: 1 across its categories
Named in: 4 answers
Its own site cited: in 4 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Names read as Romify

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Romify; a claim can dispute any of them.

Romify / Wave 1

Follow Romify

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Romify's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Romify, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Romify by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Romify is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Romify, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.