GTM AI Index

Index › Vendors › REmail · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

REmail

9Judge labels

2First choices

0Negative labels

7 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. REmail was named 3 times in Direct mail, where Postalytics led with 54%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business6 of 57

under the label threshold

Mid-market16 of 58

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In direct mail · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named REmail for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Print	Marketing	0%	16 of 58	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Postalytics at 54%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for REmail yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated REmail across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	1
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained7 labels2

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative2 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative9 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best for Ultra-Low Cost (High Volume Targeted): REmail” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Direct mail · budget prompt · alternative

“Best Value per Piece (No Subscription at All): REmail” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Direct mail · budget prompt · alternative

“REmail — Lowest Per-Piece Rates” MiniMax M2.5 · Direct mail · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as REmail, over the 9 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and REmail was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Postalytics7 of 90Not in the top three

Click2Mail6 of 91Not in the top three

Mailjoy5 of 91Not in the top three

Stannp5 of 91Not in the top three

PostGrid5 of 90Not in the top three

PostcardMania5 of 90Not in the top three

Lob4 of 90Not in the top three

PostKnock3 of 92Not in the top three

PostPilot2 of 91Not in the top three

Wise Pelican2 of 90Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

The company

REmail.

Website: remaildirect.com
Headquarters: Charlotte, United States

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when REmail's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as REmail, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at remaildirect.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.