GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › Propulso · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Propulso

20Judge labels
4First choices
1Negative labels
8 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
5% in Proximity for small business buyers
Rank 8 of 131 in the mid-market standing
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 4 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In proximity · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Propulso for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Retail, proximity and IoT marketingMarketing4%8 of 1310%4under 10 labels · led by Radar at 19%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Propulso yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Propulso across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar10001
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash10001
Kimi K200101
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labels1
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative6 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained7 labels3
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative20 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“the strongest fit in the results is Propulso, which is explicitly listed as "Best for small business use"” Perplexity Sonar · Proximity · budget prompt · first choice
“the best proximity marketing platform for a company with a limited budget is Propulso” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Proximity · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Propulso, over the 20 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Propulso was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Radar13 of 203Not in the top three
Foursquare10 of 202Not in the top three
YOOSE10 of 200Not in the top three
PlotProjects9 of 204Not in the top three
Kontakt.io9 of 202Not in the top three
Estimote6 of 201Not in the top three
NearBee4 of 201Not in the top three
Bluedot4 of 200Not in the top three
InMarket4 of 200Not in the top three
PromoInCloud4 of 200Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Propulso. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 20 answers that named Propulso and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

clicksgeek.com3
f6s.com3
mobileappdaily.com3
thecmo.com3
databox.com2
gartner.com2
guideflow.com2
mobilozophy.com2
monday.com2
netpeak.us2

Twenty-four of the twenty-four domain citations in answers naming Propulso came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Propulso's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Propulso, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at propulso.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack