Index › Products › PGP · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

PGP

4Judge labels

1First choices

0Negative labels

4 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

4 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. PGP was named 4 times in Pricing optimization, where Pricefx led with 53%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market7 of 76

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In pricing optimization · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named PGP for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Pricing optimization	Revenue operations	2%	7 of 76	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by Pricefx at 53%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for PGP yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated PGP across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	1	0	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	1	1
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase4 labels1

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative4 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“This AI-driven pricing management software helps businesses determine and optimize product and service prices based on real-time market trends.” Mistral Small · Pricing optimization · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Best for AI-Driven Optimization: PGP (by PREXUS)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Pricing optimization · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as PGP, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and PGP was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Zilliant4 of 42Not among the top eight

Pricefx2 of 41Not among the top eight

Prisync2 of 40Not among the top eight

Vendavo2 of 40Not among the top eight

Articsledge1 of 40Not among the top eight

Conga Price Optimization & Management1 of 40Not among the top eight

Orb1 of 40Not among the top eight

OroCommerce1 of 40Not among the top eight

PROS Smart Price Optimization & Management1 of 40Not among the top eight

Skuuudle1 of 40Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named PGP. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 4 answers that named PGP and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

getapp.com4

virtocommerce.com4

withorb.com4

articsledge.com2

guideflow.com2

verifiedmarketresearch.com2

worldmetrics.org2

dupple.com1

f6s.com1

learn.g2.com1

No domain is on file for PGP, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

getapp.com/sales-software/pricing-optimization/org/mid-size-business4

virtocommerce.com/blog/b2b-pricing-tools-software4

withorb.com/blog/competitive-pricing-tools4

withorb.com/blog/pricing-analytics-software3

articsledge.com/post/best-ai-pricing-tools2

guideflow.com/blog/price-optimization-software2

verifiedmarketresearch.com/blog/best-pricing-optimization-software2

dupple.com/learn/best-ai-price-optimization-tools1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as PGP

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as PGP; a claim can dispute any of them.

PGP by PREXUS 3PGP (by PREXUS) 1

Follow PGP

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when PGP's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as PGP, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for PGP by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where PGP is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name PGP, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.