GTM AI Index

Index › Vendors › Pabbly · September 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

Pabbly

7Judge labels

1First choices

0Negative labels

6 of 12Models named it

2Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

4 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Pabbly was named 4 times in Billing and 1 other category, where Chargebee led with 58%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market9 of 57

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In billing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Pabbly for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Billing and subscription management	Revenue operations	2%	9 of 57	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Chargebee at 58%
Marketing automation and campaign management	Marketing	0%	18 of 53	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Marketing Hub at 55%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Pabbly yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Pabbly across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained7 labels1

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative7 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Pabbly - offers a lifetime deal pricing with no recurring monthly fees.” Llama 4 Maverick · Billing · budget prompt · first choice

“5. Pabbly Plus - *Flat Pricing*” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Marketing automation · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Pabbly, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Pabbly was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Brevo4 of 74Not in the top three

ActiveCampaign4 of 72Not in the top three

Zoho Marketing+4 of 70Not in the top three

OttoKit3 of 70Not in the top three

Clearout2 of 70Not in the top three

HubSpot Marketing Hub2 of 70Not in the top three

Mailchimp2 of 70Not in the top three

Omnisend2 of 70Not in the top three

Bouncer1 of 71Not in the top three

QuickEmailVerification1 of 71Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Pabbly. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 1 of the 7 answers that named Pabbly and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

clean.email1

cleanlist.ai1

debounce.com1

hunter.io1

mailsfinder.com1

mailtrap.io1

myemailverifier.com1

oppora.ai1

tomba.io1

usebouncer.com1

Ten of the ten domain citations in answers naming Pabbly came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

clean.email/verifier/best-email-verification-services-and-tools1

cleanlist.ai/blog/2026-05-08-best-free-email-verifier-tools1

debounce.com/blog/email-verification-tools1

hunter.io/email-verification-guide/best-email-verifiers1

mailsfinder.com/blog/best-free-email-verifier-tools1

mailtrap.io/blog/email-verification-tools1

myemailverifier.com/blog/email-verification-api-pricing1

oppora.ai/blog/cheapest-email-verification-tool1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Pabbly

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Pabbly; a claim can dispute any of them.

Pabbly Plus 2

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Pabbly's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Pabbly, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at pabbly.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.