| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Client onboarding platforms | Customer | 0% | 14 of 104 | 20% | 20 | accepted challenger | |
| Digital sales rooms | Sales | 0% | 39 of 73 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Dock at 29% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| In-app messaging and customer communications | Customer | 0% | 52 of 105 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Intercom at 21% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Safer Alternatives to Consider ... Moxo — praised for secure client collaboration spaces” Kimi K2 · Client onboarding · negative prompt · first choice
“Best for teams needing secure client workspaces with messaging and document workflows” MiniMax M2.5 · Client onboarding · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Moxo is often recommended for guided, secure onboarding experiences” GPT-5.4 mini · Client onboarding · budget prompt · alternative
“Secure documents, approvals, and client workflows: Moxo.” GPT-6 Luna · Client onboarding · comparative prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Users note a lack of essential features in Moxo, such as client portal simulations and advanced notification controls.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Client onboarding · negative prompt · soft negative
“it comes with specific drawbacks that make it risky for standard SaaS or agency onboarding” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Client onboarding · negative prompt · soft negative
“starts at a higher price point; however, if you can stretch the budget slightly” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Client onboarding · budget prompt · soft negative
“High price floor (~$200+/month minimum) relative to feature set” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Client onboarding · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 51 of the 51 answers that named Moxo and are not a share of its labels.
161 of the 177 domain citations in answers naming Moxo came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 324 | 7 | 2026-09-25 | ||
| Case study | 44 | 0 | 2025-10-13 | ||
| Comparison | 35 | 2 | 2026-08-04 | ||
| Template or tool | 15 | 0 | 2026-06-30 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 9 | 3 | 2026-09-17 |
Every page moxo.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Moxo's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: moxo.com, moxo.com/pricing, moxo.com/security, moxo.com/customers, moxo.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Moxo's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Moxo, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Moxo by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: