GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › Keen Decision Systems · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Keen Decision Systems

11Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
6 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
4 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Keen Decision Systems was named 4 times in Attribution & MMM, where Dreamdata led with 29%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In attribution & mmm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Keen Decision Systems for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Attribution and marketing mix modelingMarketing0%34 of 1240%4under 10 labels · led by Dreamdata at 29%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Keen Decision Systems yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Keen Decision Systems across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500101
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast01001
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K201102
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase3 labelsNone
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative11 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“For MMM (Marketing Mix Modeling), consider Keen Decision Systems or Cassandra as accessible starting points.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Attribution & MMM · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Keen Decision Systems — mid-market friendly with 14-day free trial” Kimi K2 · Attribution & MMM · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Keen Decision Systems, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Keen Decision Systems was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Recast10 of 110Not in the top three
Dreamdata9 of 113Not in the top three
Google Meridian9 of 111Not in the top three
HockeyStack8 of 111Not in the top three
Meta Robyn7 of 110Not in the top three
Measured5 of 111Not in the top three
Adobe Mix Modeler5 of 110Not in the top three
Factors.ai5 of 110Not in the top three
HubSpot Marketing Hub5 of 110Not in the top three
Rockerbox5 of 110Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Keen Decision Systems. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 1 of the 11 answers that named Keen Decision Systems and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

adbeacon.com1
businessofapps.com1
cometly.com1
factors.ai1
funnel.io1
gartner.com1
hockeystack.com1
improvado.io1
keends.com1
liftlab.com1

Ten of the ten domain citations in answers naming Keen Decision Systems came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Keen Decision Systems's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Keen Decision Systems, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at keen.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack