Every category where a model named Ingest IQ for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Tag management	GTM data and infrastructure	2%	4 of 67	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by Google Tag Manager at 81%	▼−4Since September 2026: 6% → 2%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Ingest IQ held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · Tag management · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

0%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 20 → 15 of 36

Mid-market▼−4Since September 2026: 6% → 2%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

2%from 6% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 3 → 4 of 56

EnterprisegoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.

0%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 11 pointsNot ranked

All categories · Mid-market

Category	September 2026	Now	Change	Reading	Rank
Tag management	6%	2%	▼−4Since September 2026: 6% → 2%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 3 → 4 of 67

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Ingest IQ across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.20	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct4 labels1

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative5 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“For mid-market B2B companies, Ingest IQ offers the best balance of functionality, ease of use, and cost-effectiveness” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Tag management · direct prompt · first choice

“Consider Ingest IQ if you want a mid-market-oriented platform with a strong ranking signal” Perplexity Sonar · Tag management · direct prompt · alternative

“Mid-market focused modern alternative: Ingest IQ” Muse Glimmer 30B · Tag management · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Ingest IQ, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Ingest IQ was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Google Tag Manager5 of 53Not among the top eight

Tealium iQ Tag Management2 of 50Not among the top eight

Adobe Experience Platform Tags1 of 50Not among the top eight

CHEQ Manage1 of 50Not among the top eight

Lokker1 of 50Not among the top eight

Matomo Tag Manager1 of 50Not among the top eight

Piwik PRO Tag Manager1 of 50Not among the top eight

TagCommander1 of 50Not among the top eight

Tealium Customer Data Hub1 of 50Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Ingest IQ. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 5 answers that named Ingest IQ and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

guideflow.com5

usercentrics.com4

devopsschool.com3

lokker.com3

observepoint.com3

peerspot.com3

techdogs.com3

zipdo.co3

checkthat.ai2

g2.com2

No domain is on file for Ingest IQ, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

guideflow.com/blog/best-tag-management-tools5

usercentrics.com/guides/smarter-tagging-with-google-tag-manager4

devopsschool.com/blog/top-10-tag-management-tools-in-2025-features-pros-cons-comparison3

lokker.com/compare/tag-managers3

peerspot.com/categories/tag-management3

zipdo.co/best/tag-management-software3

g2.com/categories/tag-management-systems2

gartner.com/reviews/market/tag-management2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where Ingest IQ stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Searches for its name, Google: not counted (“ingest iq”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 0 a month
Its own site: No site of its own on file, so no site figures

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 4 of 67 in tag management

Segment leader

81%

Google Tag Manager

First choices: 1 across its categories
Named in: 5 answers
Its own site cited: No site on file to match

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Follow Ingest IQ

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Ingest IQ's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Ingest IQ, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Ingest IQ by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Ingest IQ is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Ingest IQ, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.