Every category where a model named Ingest IQ for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Tag management	GTM data and infrastructure	6%	3 of 59	12%	8	under 10 labels · led by Google Tag Manager at 77%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Ingest IQ yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Ingest IQ across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	0	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	2	0	0	0	2
Kimi K2	0	1	0	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	1	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct4 labels2

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative4 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labels1

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative10 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“The "Mid-Market Sweet Spot." | Specifically targets teams that find GTM too chaotic but Tealium too expensive.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Tag management · scale prompt · first choice

“Ingest IQ offers the best balance of modern features, ease of use, and pricing” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Tag management · direct prompt · first choice

“The best tag management system for a mid-market B2B company is Ingest IQ” Llama 4 Maverick · Tag management · direct prompt · first choice

“A newer option specifically positioning itself for mid-market teams wanting modern server-side capabilities with simpler setup” Kimi K2 · Tag management · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Less established than market leaders” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Tag management · comparative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Ingest IQ, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Ingest IQ was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Google Tag Manager9 of 106Not in the top three

Tealium iQ8 of 100Not in the top three

Piwik PRO7 of 100Not in the top three

Adobe Experience Platform Tags6 of 100Not in the top three

Segment5 of 100Not in the top three

ObservePoint4 of 100Not in the top three

Matomo3 of 100Not in the top three

TagCommander3 of 100Not in the top three

Ensighten Manage2 of 100Not in the top three

Matomo Tag Manager2 of 100Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Ingest IQ's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Ingest IQ, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at ingest.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.