AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Informatica IDMC · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Informatica IDMC

4Judge labels
1First choices
0Negative labels
4 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Informatica IDMC was named 1 time in PIM, where Plytix led with 34%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market42 of 68
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In pim · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Informatica IDMC for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Product information managementRevenue operations0%42 of 680%1under 10 labels · led by Plytix at 34%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Informatica IDMC yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Informatica IDMC across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00101
Grok 4.2000000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase1 label1
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative4 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Informatica IDMC, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Informatica IDMC was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
DemandTools2 of 40Not among the top eight
Prizm by DQLabs1 of 41Not among the top eight
Workato1 of 41Not among the top eight
1WorldSync1 of 40Not among the top eight
Akeneo PIM1 of 40Not among the top eight
Ataccama ONE1 of 40Not among the top eight
Bluestone PIM1 of 40Not among the top eight
Boomi1 of 40Not among the top eight
Catsy1 of 40Not among the top eight
Clay1 of 40Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Informatica IDMC. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 4 answers that named Informatica IDMC and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com2
gartner.com2
learn.g2.com2
apix-drive.com1
atlassian.com1
azure.microsoft.com1
blog.saleslayer.com1
blogs.oracle.com1
capterra.com1
cio.economictimes.indiatimes.com1

Thirteen of the thirteen domain citations in answers naming Informatica IDMC came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

apix-drive.com/en/blog/other/ipaas-forrester1
atlassian.com/agile/project-management/workflow-automation-software1
azure.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/microsoft-named-a-leader-in-2024-gartner-magic-quadrant-for1
azure.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/tag/forrester1
blog.saleslayer.com/the-best-pims-software1
blogs.oracle.com/cloud-infrastructure/oracle-a-leader-gartner-magic-quadrant-ipaas-20241
capterra.com/data-quality-software1
cio.economictimes.indiatimes.com/tools/best-ipaas-platforms/1267865431

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

informatica.com ranks 7 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Informatica IDMC takes 0% of first choices and Plytix takes 34%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “product information management system”
7
Position for “best product information management system”
–
not in the top ten
Organic visits to its site
about 73,321 a month
Searches its site ranks for
12,447 · 1,061 in the top three
Sites linking to it
12,870
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
120+ ads · 112 text, 8 image · 120 shown in the last 30 days

First shown January 2025, as Informatica LLC, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 113 in the year, 7 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 42 of 68 in PIM
Segment leader
34%
Plytix
First choices
1 across its categories
Named in
4 answers
Its own site cited
in 4 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on informatica.com
10,003
subdomains included
Content
1,279
counted in the table below
Documentation
6
Product · Integration
162 · 22
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog59802023-04-27
Podcast or video288undated
News or press14202026-05-01
Glossary or explainer12312026-07-08
Case study7802025-06-24
Conference or event1732026-10-27
Comparison1402023-09-13
Report or ebook9undated
Webinar or virtual event702024-10-09
Template or tool302024-08-12

Events in person

Last twelve months

As the event pages on informatica.com state them, read September 28, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page informatica.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Informatica IDMC

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Informatica is the company behind Informatica IDMC.
ShowHide

On record

Wikidata
Headquarters
Redwood City, United States
Founded
1993
Ownership
Public, INFA on New York Stock Exchange

Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Informatica IDMC's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Informatica IDMC, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Informatica IDMC by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Informatica IDMC is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Informatica IDMC, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at informatica.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.