GTM AI Index

Index › Vendors › Informatica Cloud Data Quality · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Informatica Cloud Data Quality

13Judge labels

4First choices

3Negative labels

8 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

2 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Informatica Cloud Data Quality was named 2 times in CRM data quality, where Insycle led with 34%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business108 of 115

under the label threshold

Mid-market89 of 104

under the label threshold

Enterprise4 of 104

under the label threshold

In crm data quality · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Informatica Cloud Data Quality for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
CRM data quality and deduplication	Revenue operations	0%	89 of 104	50%	2	under 10 labels · led by Insycle at 34%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Informatica Cloud Data Quality yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Informatica Cloud Data Quality across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labels2

Paraphrase4 labels1

Comparative3 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained1 label1

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative3 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative13 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Complex enterprise setup” Mistral Small · CRM data quality · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Informatica Cloud Data Quality, over the 13 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Informatica Cloud Data Quality was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

DemandTools13 of 132Not in the top three

Insycle7 of 131Not in the top three

ZoomInfo Operations6 of 130Not in the top three

Openprise5 of 131Not in the top three

Cleanlist4 of 132Not in the top three

Cloudingo4 of 131Not in the top three

Apollo.io4 of 130Not in the top three

HubSpot Breeze Intelligence4 of 130Not in the top three

SAP Data Services4 of 130Not in the top three

ZoomInfo4 of 130Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Informatica Cloud Data Quality. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 13 answers that named Informatica Cloud Data Quality and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cleanlist.ai4

clearout.io4

cognism.com4

findymail.com4

gitnux.org3

integrate.io3

morsoftware.com3

nrev.ai3

worldmetrics.org3

amplemarket.com2

Thirty-three of the thirty-three domain citations in answers naming Informatica Cloud Data Quality came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

cleanlist.ai/blog/2026-03-27-data-quality-tools4

clearout.io/blog/crm-data-cleaning-solutions4

cognism.com/blog/data-quality-software4

findymail.com/blog/crm-data-quality3

gitnux.org/service/crm-data-quality3

integrate.io/blog/top-10-data-cleansing-tools3

morsoftware.com/blog/data-hygiene-tools3

nrev.ai/blog/data-matching-tools3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

The company

Informatica is the company behind Informatica Cloud Data Quality.

Website: informatica.com
Headquarters: Redwood City, United States
Founded: 1993
Ownership: Public, INFA on New York Stock Exchange

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Informatica Cloud Data Quality's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Informatica Cloud Data Quality, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at informatica.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.