GTM AI Index

Index › Vendors › Google Video Partners (GVP) / TrueView on third-party sites · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Google Video Partners (GVP) / TrueView on third-party sites

1Judge labels

0First choices

1Negative labels

1 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

1 label, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Google Video Partners (GVP) / TrueView on third-party sites was named 1 time in Video ads, where StackAdapt led with 24%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market111 of 121

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In video ads · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Google Video Partners (GVP) / TrueView on third-party sites for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Video advertising	Marketing	0%	111 of 121	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by StackAdapt at 24%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Google Video Partners (GVP) / TrueView on third-party sites yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Google Video Partners (GVP) / TrueView on third-party sites across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative1 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Opt out of GVP if possible; stick to YouTube-only.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Video ads · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Google Video Partners (GVP) / TrueView on third-party sites, over the 1 answer that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Google Video Partners (GVP) / TrueView on third-party sites was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Roku1 of 10Not in the top three

Spotify1 of 10Not in the top three

Taboola1 of 10Not in the top three

The Trade Desk1 of 10Not in the top three

TikTok Ads1 of 10Not in the top three

YouTube Ads1 of 10Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

The company

Google Search is the company behind Google Video Partners (GVP) / TrueView on third-party sites.

Website: google.com
Headquarters: United States
Founded: 1997

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Google Video Partners (GVP) / TrueView on third-party sites's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Google Video Partners (GVP) / TrueView on third-party sites, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at google.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.