Every category where a model named Gamifier for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Sales gamification	Sales	6%	5 of 64	0%	5	under 10 labels · led by Spinify at 31%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Gamifier yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Gamifier across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	1	1	2
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative2 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained5 labels4

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative8 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Gamifier is highlighted as the better fit for budget-conscious teams looking for broad gamification features” Mistral Small · Sales gamification · budget prompt · first choice

“Top Pick: Gamifier ... If you're cost-constrained, Gamifier is your best overall choice.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Sales gamification · budget prompt · first choice

“For a limited budget, my best pick is Gamifier.” GPT-5.4 mini · Sales gamification · budget prompt · first choice

“worth considering if budget is the main driver” GPT-5.4 mini · Sales gamification · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Gamifier, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Gamifier was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Spinify7 of 81Not among the top eight

Ambition5 of 80Not among the top eight

SalesScreen5 of 80Not among the top eight

Pointagram4 of 80Not among the top eight

Plecto3 of 80Not among the top eight

SmartWinnr3 of 80Not among the top eight

BoardQ1 of 81Not among the top eight

Grit Board1 of 81Not among the top eight

Agile CRM1 of 80Not among the top eight

Arcade1 of 80Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Gamifier. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 8 of the 8 answers that named Gamifier and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com7

itechguides.com4

fitsmallbusiness.com3

guideflow.com3

attention.com2

capterra.com2

gamifier.coYour site2

kendo.ai2

openloyalty.io2

plecto.com2

Twenty-seven of the twenty-nine domain citations in answers naming Gamifier came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

g2.com/products/gamifier/pricing4

fitsmallbusiness.com/sales-gamification-software3

g2.com/categories/sales-gamification/small-business3

guideflow.com/blog/best-sales-gamification-software3

itechguides.com/best/sales-gamification-software3

attention.com/blog-posts/top-sales-gamification-platforms2

g2.com/categories/sales-gamification/enterprise2

g2.com/categories/sales-gamification/free2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

gamifier.co is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Gamifier takes 6% of first choices and Spinify takes 31%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “sales gamification platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “best sales gamification platform”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 20 a month (“gamifier”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 634 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 28 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 34 · 0 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 274
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on Google

None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 5 of 64 in sales gamification

Segment leader

31%

Spinify

First choices: 4 across its categories
Named in: 8 answers
Its own site cited: in 8 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on gamifier.co

121

subdomains included

Content

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

0 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	38	0	2022-01-26	CRM, Sales gamification
Comparison	3	undated
Glossary or explainer	1	0	2019-11-25

Most recent

2022-01-26Gamifier announces newest integration with zendesk blog
2021-10-14Gamifier announces partnership with salesloft blog
2021-09-27September 2021 product updates the reward store player wallet blog
2021-09-09Gamifier announces acceptance into newchip accelerator program blog
2021-06-09Your crm is great but it could be better blog
2021-05-26My sales team is doing fine why do i need gamifier blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page gamifier.co exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Gamifier

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Gamifier's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Gamifier, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Gamifier by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Gamifier is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Gamifier, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.