Every category where a model named Everflow for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Referral and partner programs	Partner and channel	2%	13 of 107	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by PartnerStack at 19%
Affiliate and partner management	Partner and channel	2%	10 of 87	12%	8	under 10 labels · led by PartnerStack at 42%
Channel partner and local marketing	Partner and channel	0%	47 of 108	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by JourneyBee at 15%
Partner relationship management	Partner and channel	0%	35 of 50	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Channeltivity at 24%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Everflow yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Everflow across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	2	1	0	3
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	2	0	0	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	1	0	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	2	0	0	0	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	2	0	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct8 labelsNone

Paraphrase20 labels1

Comparative14 labelsNone

Budget-constrained3 labels1

Scale-constrained8 labels1

Negative3 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative56 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“I'd steer you toward PartnerStack if partnerships are strategic, or Everflow if you just need bulletproof tracking.” Kimi K2 · Referrals · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Everflow or Tapfiliate Scale if you're ecommerce” Kimi K2 · Affiliate · scale prompt · first choice

“A highly technical, performance-oriented tracking platform... though historically favored more by ad networks and performance marketers.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Affiliate · scale prompt · alternative

“a solid option if you want affiliate + creator + referral programs in one platform” GPT-5.4 mini · Affiliate · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid for now: Enterprise like Impact/Everflow (overpriced at $500+)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Affiliate · paraphrase prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Everflow, over the 56 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Everflow was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

PartnerStack50 of 5621Not in the top three

impact.com49 of 5627Not in the top three

CJ Affiliate12 of 561Not in the top three

Post Affiliate Pro11 of 562Not in the top three

Tapfiliate11 of 562Not in the top three

TUNE11 of 561Not in the top three

Awin10 of 560Not in the top three

Partnerize10 of 560Not in the top three

Refersion10 of 560Not in the top three

Rewardful8 of 563Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Everflow. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 12 of the 56 answers that named Everflow and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

partnerstack.com7

modash.io6

everflow.ioYour site5

impact.com5

influencermarketinghub.com5

linkjolt.io5

getreditus.com4

referralcandy.com4

tapfiliate.com4

introw.io3

Forty-three of the forty-eight domain citations in answers naming Everflow came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

influencermarketinghub.com/affiliate-marketing-software-platforms4

linkjolt.io/blog/best-affiliate-marketing-platforms4

modash.io/blog/affiliate-marketing-platforms4

partnerstack.com/platform/affiliates4

referralcandy.com/blog/best-affiliate-program-software-in-2026-ranked-by-features-pricing-4

influencermarketinghub.com/affiliate-marketing-websites3

introw.io/blog/best-affiliate-management-software3

modash.io/blog/affiliate-management-software-tools3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Everflow's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Everflow, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at everflow.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.