AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Partnerize · October 2026 Edition
3 categories · Ranked

Partnerize

30Judge labels
2First choices
5Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Affiliate for enterprise buyers
Rank 27 of 94 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 2 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In affiliate · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Partnerize for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Affiliate and partner managementPartner and channel0%27 of 940%2under 10 labels · led by PartnerStack at 49%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Channel partner and local marketingPartner and channel0%122 of 124100%2under 10 labels · led by Channelscaler at 10%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
Referral and partner programsPartner and channel0%57 of 1120%1under 10 labels · led by PartnerStack at 22%

Movement

Since September 2026, Partnerize held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · Affiliate · by segment

Small businessgoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsNot ranked
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 37 → 25 of 90
Enterprise▼−4Since September 2026: 6% → 2%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 6% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 3 → 5 of 46

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Affiliate0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 37 → 27 of 94
Channel marketing0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 122 of 124, unchanged
Referrals0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 57 of 112, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Partnerize across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500011
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash01001
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.2000000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00011
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500101
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B01001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct6 labelsNone
Paraphrase4 labels1
Comparative10 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained3 labels1
Negative6 labels2not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative30 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Partnerize: A robust enterprise platform with powerful automation and predictive analytics tools” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Affiliate · scale prompt · alternative
“Runner-up / best for multi-campaign mid-market programs” Muse Glimmer 30B · Referrals · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“there are some concerns: no free trial or customer service if not a paid user, and difficult to find pricing for the platform” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Channel marketing · negative prompt · soft negative
“Fast time-to-ROI compared to enterprise-heavy alternatives like Partnerize.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Channel marketing · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Partnerize, over the 30 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Partnerize was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
impact.com25 of 3013Not among the top eight
PartnerStack20 of 308Not among the top eight
Awin14 of 300Not among the top eight
CJ Affiliate9 of 300Not among the top eight
Everflow9 of 300Not among the top eight
Rakuten Advertising7 of 300Not among the top eight
TUNE5 of 300Not among the top eight
Ambassador4 of 302Not among the top eight
Tapfiliate4 of 301Not among the top eight
ShareASale4 of 300Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Partnerize. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 28 of the 30 answers that named Partnerize and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

modash.io13
g2.com12
tapfiliate.com12
guideflow.com10
learn.g2.com8
gen3marketing.com6
impact.com6
joinbrands.com6
postaffiliatepro.com6
resources.rework.com6

Eighty-five of the eighty-five domain citations in answers naming Partnerize came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

partnerize.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Partnerize takes 0% of first choices and PartnerStack takes 49%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “affiliate marketing platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best affiliate marketing platform”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
1,600 a month (“partnerize”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
294,041 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 28,889 a month
Searches its site ranks for
1,339 · 113 in the top three
Sites linking to it
4,750
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
9 ads · 8 text, 1 image · 3 shown in the last 30 days

First shown September 2023, as Pepperjam, LLC, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 5 in the year, 4 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 27 of 94 in affiliate
Segment leader
49%
PartnerStack
First choices
2 across its categories
Named in
30 answers
Its own site cited
in 28 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on partnerize.com
1,028
subdomains included
Content
880
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
7 · 3
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog780192026-09-28Influencer, Affiliate
Webinar or virtual event3902025-09-09
Case study1902025-09-25
Comparison1412026-08-26SEO
Report or ebook1312026-09-22
Conference or event702023-08-02
Template or tool502026-05-22
Glossary or explainer302026-03-17
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page partnerize.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Partnerize

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Partnerize.
ShowHide

On record

Wikidata
Headquarters
Forty Fort, United States
Founded
2010

Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
The All-in-One Affiliate Automation Platform
For
businesses
Price stated
pricing optionality based on your brand’s unique needs; offers both a license model and a performance-based structure partnerize.com/pricing
Hosting
more than 214 countries and territories
Customers named
James DeStefanoGoProThe IconicAesopFlight CentreGrowth HQHealthylifeInspiring Vacations
Not stated on the pages read
Starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications

What Partnerize's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: partnerize.com, partnerize.com/pricing, partnerize.com/platform, partnerize.com/resources/type/case-studies, partnerize.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Partnerize's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Partnerize, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Partnerize by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Partnerize is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Partnerize, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at partnerize.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.