Every category where a model named Partnerize for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Affiliate and partner management	Partner and channel	0%	38 of 87	25%	4	under 10 labels · led by PartnerStack at 42%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Partnerize yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Partnerize across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative9 labelsNone

Budget-constrained2 labels2

Scale-constrained3 labels1

Negative3 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative20 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“An enterprise competitor to Impact. Very strong in data analytics, global payouts, and fraud prevention.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Affiliate · scale prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Custom/quote-only | Enterprise-level, likely $50K+/year” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Affiliate · scale prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Partnerize, over the 20 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Partnerize was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

impact.com19 of 2012Not in the top three

PartnerStack15 of 204Not in the top three

Awin13 of 201Not in the top three

CJ Affiliate12 of 200Not in the top three

Everflow10 of 200Not in the top three

Rakuten Advertising7 of 200Not in the top three

ShareASale6 of 201Not in the top three

Tapfiliate5 of 200Not in the top three

ClickBank4 of 200Not in the top three

Post Affiliate Pro3 of 200Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Partnerize. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 20 answers that named Partnerize and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

go.partnerize.comYour site2

awin.com1

everflow.io1

impact.com1

partnerize.comYour site1

rakutenadvertising.com1

Four of the seven domain citations in answers naming Partnerize came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

awin.com/us/pricing/advertisers1

everflow.io/competitor/impact1

go.partnerize.com/hubfs/1.%20PARTNERIZE/1.%20Global/10.%20Whitepapers/DC360_2023_LeadingVe1

go.partnerize.com/hubfs/1.%20PARTNERIZE/1.%20Global/4.%20Forrester/The_Total_Economic_Impa1

impact.com/1

partnerize.com/platform1

rakutenadvertising.com/media-and-press/rakuten-and-impact-com-announce-alliance-to-scale-t1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

The company

Partnerize.

Website: partnerize.com
Headquarters: Forty Fort, United States
Founded: 2010

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Partnerize's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Partnerize, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at partnerize.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.