AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Creatify.ai · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Creatify.ai

13Judge labels
3First choices
3Negative labels
7 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
5 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Creatify.ai was named 5 times in Creative automation, where Bannerflow led with 19%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In creative automation · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Creatify.ai for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Creative automation platformsMarketing2%12 of 1090%5under 10 labels · led by Bannerflow at 19%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Creatify.ai yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Creatify.ai across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini10001
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small01001
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick02002
Qwen 3.7 Flash01001
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labels2
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained5 labels1
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative3 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative13 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best budget pick overall: Creatify AI ... I'd start with Creatify AI” GPT-5.4 mini · Creative automation · budget prompt · first choice
“best for mid-sized teams that produce a lot of display banners and want more polish than a generic builder without enterprise pricing” Llama 4 Maverick · Creative automation · direct prompt · alternative
“Creatify.ai - offers a Bulk Create feature that can turn a CSV or spreadsheet into hundreds of design variants” Llama 4 Maverick · Creative automation · budget prompt · alternative
“If video is a key part of your strategy, Creatify.ai is also a strong contender.” Mistral Small · Creative automation · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Creatify.ai, over the 13 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Creatify.ai was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Smartly6 of 131Not among the top eight
AdCreative.ai5 of 131Not among the top eight
The Brief4 of 131Not among the top eight
Canva3 of 132Not among the top eight
Bannerflow3 of 131Not among the top eight
Celtra3 of 130Not among the top eight
Creatopy2 of 131Not among the top eight
Abyssale2 of 130Not among the top eight
Bannerbear2 of 130Not among the top eight
Marq Team2 of 130Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Creatify.ai. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 13 of the 13 answers that named Creatify.ai and are not a share of its labels.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on creatify.ai
5,335
subdomains included
Content
1,003
counted in the table below
Documentation
195
Product · Integration
90 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog602452026-09-28SEO, Ecommerce marketing
Template or tool238902026-09-28
Comparison80462026-09-28
Case study4042026-08-26
Report or ebook2192026-09-29
Glossary or explainer2082026-09-05
Conference or event202026-05-05

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page creatify.ai exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Creatify.ai

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Creatify.ai; a claim can dispute any of them.
Creatify AI 1

Follow Creatify.ai

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Creatify.ai's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Creatify.ai, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Creatify.ai by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Creatify.ai is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Creatify.ai, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at creatify.ai is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.