AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Conveyor · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Conveyor

13Judge labels
0First choices
4Negative labels
7 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
4 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Conveyor was named 4 times in RFP response, where Loopio led with 25%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In rfp response · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Conveyor for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
RFP response softwareSales0%24 of 820%4under 10 labels · led by Loopio at 25%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Conveyor yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Conveyor across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00101
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.2000000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick01001
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00101
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna01001
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative7 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative13 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Conveyor - Offers agentic answer generation from multiple source types” Llama 4 Maverick · RFP response · direct prompt · alternative
“Prioritize security questionnaires: Conveyor” GPT-6 Luna · RFP response · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Conveyor, over the 13 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Conveyor was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Responsive12 of 134Not among the top eight
Loopio12 of 132Not among the top eight
Upland Qvidian9 of 132Not among the top eight
Arphie4 of 130Not among the top eight
AutoRFP.ai3 of 130Not among the top eight
Ombud3 of 130Not among the top eight
PandaDoc3 of 130Not among the top eight
DeepRFP2 of 131Not among the top eight
AutogenAI2 of 130Not among the top eight
HeyIris2 of 130Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Conveyor. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 13 of the 13 answers that named Conveyor and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

loopio.com8
responsive.io8
conveyor.comYour site5
inventive.ai5
learn.g2.com5
storyflow.so5
arphie.ai4
autogenai.com4
bidsparq.com4
guideflow.com4

Forty-seven of the fifty-two domain citations in answers naming Conveyor came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on conveyor.com
174
subdomains included
Content
100
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
11 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog66undated
Comparison16undated
Case study15undated
Template or tool1undated
Glossary or explainer1undated
News or press1undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page conveyor.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Conveyor

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Conveyor is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
AI platform for high-stakes customer requests including security reviews, vendor assessments, and RFPs.
For
enterprise companies
Price stated
Priced on usage, not access conveyor.com/pricing
Starting price
9600 conveyor.com/pricing
Free plan or trial
Free tier that stays free; Free; Put Our AI to the Test in a Free Trial conveyor.com/pricing
Certifications
SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001SOC 2 Type 2
Customers named
AtlassianCartadbt LabsZapierSumo LogicAlteryxLucidTemporal
Not stated on the pages read
Integrations, hosting

What Conveyor's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: conveyor.com, conveyor.com, conveyor.com/pricing, trust.conveyor.com, conveyor.com/products/analytics. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Conveyor's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Conveyor, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Conveyor by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Conveyor is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Conveyor, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at conveyor.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.