Small business▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 35 → 18 of 125
1 category · Named, not rankedCapturify
5Judge labels
3First choices
0Negative labels
4 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Capturify was named 2 times in Identity, where Hightouch Adaptive Identity Resolution led with 12%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business10 of 131
3%3 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market19 of 140
2%2 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In identity · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Capturify for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Identity resolution | GTM data and infrastructure | 2% | 19 of 140 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Hightouch Adaptive Identity Resolution at 12% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Capturify held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Identity · by segment
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 40 → 17 of 131
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Identity | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 40 → 19 of 140 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Capturify across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Capturify across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained5 labels3
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative5 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“For the best balance of affordability and ease of use, Capturify, Identity Matrix, and CustomerLabs are among the most budget-friendly options.” Mistral Small · Identity · budget prompt · first choice
“If you need visitor identification specifically, Capturify offers excellent value at $17/month.” MiniMax M2.5 · Identity · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Capturify, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Capturify was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Capturify, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Capturify was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Capturify. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 5 answers that named Capturify and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
itechguides.com4
opensend.com4
softwaresuggest.com4
sourceforge.net4
pipelineon.com3
slashdot.org3
us.fitgap.com3
g2.com2
prospeo.io2
aboutmartech.com1
Thirty of the thirty domain citations in answers naming Capturify came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on capturify.io
90
subdomains included
Content
82
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 73 | 72 | 2026-09-28 | Enrichment, Identity | |
| Comparison | 8 | 8 | 2026-09-23 | ||
| Report or ebook | 1 | 1 | 2026-07-15 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-28Lead intelligence software blog
- 2026-09-25Website lead tracking blog
- 2026-09-24B2b buying signals blog
- 2026-09-24B2b data enrichment blog
- 2026-09-23B2b automation blog
- 2026-09-23B2b intent data blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page capturify.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Capturify
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Capturify is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Capturify is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- identity resolution software; Revenue Recovery Platform that combines three products into one — Buyer Intent Targeting, Website Visitor Identification, and Automated Revenue Recovery
- For
- agencies, service businesses, SaaS companies, ecommerce brands, and more
- Price stated
- Identify Plan starting at $97/mo or $86/mo paid quarterly (SAVE $34); Accelerate Plan starting at $197/mo or $165/mo paid quarterly (SAVE $94); Automate Plan starting at $447/mo or $397/mo paid quarterly (SAVE $150); FAQ also says Recover at $97/month, Accelerate at $197/month, Automate at $397/month, and Agency Pro at $997/month; All plans include a free 14-day trial with 500 free leads. capturify.io
- Starting price
- 97/mo capturify.io
- Free plan or trial
- free 14-day trial; 500 free leads; Sign up free capturify.io
- Integrations claimed
- 9 capturify.io
- Certifications
- GDPRCCPA
- Customers named
- Rob MarkumTina W.Jeff B.Jessica M.Derrick L.Stewart R.
- Not stated on the pages read
- Hosting
What Capturify's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: capturify.io, capturify.io/pricing. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Capturify's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Capturify, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Capturify by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Capturify is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Capturify, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.