GTM AI Index

Index › Vendors › Builderall · September 2026 Edition

3 categories · Named, not ranked

Builderall

5Judge labels

0First choices

5Negative labels

4 of 12Models named it

3Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

4 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Builderall was named 4 times in Landing pages and 2 other categories, where Unbounce led with 28%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market75 of 78

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In landing pages · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Builderall for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Landing pages and interactive content	Marketing	0%	75 of 78	100%	2	under 10 labels · led by Unbounce at 28%
Affiliate and partner management	Partner and channel	0%	62 of 87	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by PartnerStack at 42%
Content marketing platforms	Marketing	0%	137 of 159	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Content Hub at 30%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Builderall yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Builderall across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative5 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative5 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Risk Score: 93/100 (Severe) ... Frequent platform instability, support unavailable during problems, misleading marketing” MiniMax M2.5 · Content marketing · negative prompt · hard negative

“Aggressive All-in-One Funnel Builders (e.g., ClickFunnels, Builderall)... Verdict: Avoid” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Landing pages · negative prompt · hard negative

“leans heavily on recruiting affiliates to access residuals rather than product usage” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Affiliate · negative prompt · hard negative

“🚩 AVOID: Builderall” Kimi K2 · Landing pages · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Builderall, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Builderall was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Carrd2 of 52Not in the top three

Amazon Associates2 of 51Not in the top three

CJ Affiliate2 of 51Not in the top three

ShareASale2 of 51Not in the top three

Alpha Affiliates2 of 50Not in the top three

Awin2 of 50Not in the top three

ClickFunnels2 of 50Not in the top three

Duelbits2 of 50Not in the top three

Leadpages2 of 50Not in the top three

LiveGood2 of 50Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Builderall's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Builderall, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at builder.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.