AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Sales › Dialers › Aloware vs Dialpad
Sales dialers and calling · October 2026 Edition

Aloware vs Dialpad

Two of fourteen models named Aloware first on the direct prompt; zero named Dialpad. Aloware was named by seven of the fourteen models and Dialpad by ten and Aloware carries 13 labels and Dialpad 21, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Aloware

accepted challenger

Named in four categories this edition.

Dialpad

accepted challenger

United States, founded 2014. Named in seven categories this edition.

First-choice share6%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%5%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#5#8A position in a field of 13; printed, not drawn.
Labels1321A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Aloware reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Aircall was named alongside these two in nine of the fourteen direct answers. CloudTalk vs Aloware · CloudTalk vs Dialpad · JustCall vs Aloware

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the sales dialers and calling page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
AlowareFirst choices, of fourteen modelsDialpad
Direct20
Paraphrase10
Comparative10
Budget-constrained01
Scale-constrained00
Negative001 against Dialpad
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Aloware and Dialpad stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Aloware Dialpad first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Aloware on the left and Dialpad on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Aloware and Dialpad stood in it.

Aloware first, Dialpad not the choice

2 of 14 modelsDialpad was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Qwen 3.7 FlashAloware alternatives: Close, Nooks
GLM 4.7 FlashXAloware alternatives: Aircall, CloudTalk, JustCall, Koncert

Neither was the first choice, one was named

2 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Gemini 3.5 FlashNooks, Orum alternatives: Aloware, Apollo.io, Kixie PowerCall, PhoneBurner
DeepSeek V4 FlashJustCall alternatives: Aircall, Aloware, Nooks, Orum

Neither was named

10 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5Aloware Power Dialer alternatives: Aircall, JustCall, Orum
GPT-5.4 miniCloudTalk alternatives: Aircall, Gong Dialer, Salesloft Dialer
Perplexity SonarJustCall alternatives: Aircall, Orum, Salesfinity
Grok 4.1 FastKixie PowerCall alternatives: Aircall, Close, JustCall, PhoneBurner
Mistral SmallKoncert, PhoneBurner alternatives: Aircall, Genesys Cloud CX, JustCall
Llama 4 MaverickPowerDialer.ai alternatives: Nooks, PhoneBurner, RingCentral Events, Skipcall
Kimi K2Kixie PowerCall alternatives: JustCall, Koncert, Nooks, Orum
MiniMax M2.5Outreach Voice, Salesloft Dialer alternatives: Aircall, Koncert, PhoneBurner
GPT-6 LunaOrum alternatives: HubSpot Sales Hub, Nooks, Salesloft Dialer
Muse Glimmer 30BJustCall, PhoneBurner alternatives: Aircall, Aloware Power Dialer, Convoso

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Dialpad leads by four points.
Dialpad4%#6 of 8
Aloware0%#– of 8
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: Aloware leads at mid-market.
Aloware6%#5 of 13
Dialpad2%#8 of 13
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Aloware leads by four points.
Aloware9%#– of 14
Dialpad5%#6 of 14
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Aloware

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.

“Aloware is positioned as an overall winner with CRM-first features and predictable pricing starting from $30/user/month” Claude Haiku 4.5 · comparative prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend starting with Aloware if you have 20+ reps and want a complete, cost-effective platform” DeepSeek V4 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice

What the models said about Dialpad

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.

“While users praise clear call quality and reliable transcription, frequent issues include dropped calls, connection delays” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Dialpad - Best Value Entry Point” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.