GTM AI Index
Index Sales Conversation intel › Fathom vs Jiminny
Conversational intelligence and call recording · September 2026 Edition

Fathom vs Jiminny

Zero of twelve models named Fathom first on the direct prompt; one named Jiminny. Fathom was named by twelve of the twelve models and Jiminny by eight and Fathom carries 33 labels and Jiminny 22, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Fathom

accepted challenger

Named in five categories this edition.

Jiminny

accepted challenger

Named in three categories this edition.

First-choice share15%7%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate6%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#5A position in a field of 12; printed, not drawn.
Labels3322A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Fathom reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Avoma was named alongside these two in eleven of the twelve direct answers. Avoma vs Fathom · Avoma vs Jiminny · Fathom vs Gong

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the conversational intelligence and call recording page.

By framing

How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
FathomFirst choices, of twelve modelsJiminny
Direct01
Paraphrase01
Comparative10
Budget-constrained70
Scale-constrained01
Negative002 against Fathom
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.

Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, Fathom and Jiminny were named in the same answer twenty-eight times, of the 150 answers naming Fathom and the 63 naming Jiminny. In those answers Jiminny took the first choice three times and Fathom six.

Every model, every framing

The seventy-two answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Fathom and Jiminny stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
Fathom Jiminny first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Fathom on the left and Jiminny on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Fathom and Jiminny stood in it.

Jiminny first, Fathom not the choice

1 of 12 modelsFathom was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Gemini 3.5 FlashAvoma, Jiminny alternatives: Airspeed, Chorus by ZoomInfo, Clari Copilot

Neither was the first choice, one was named

6 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Perplexity SonarAvoma alternatives: Airspeed, Clari Copilot, Gong, Jiminny
Grok 4.1 FastGong alternatives: Avoma, Chorus by ZoomInfo, Clari Copilot, Fathom
Mistral SmallAvoma alternatives: Coffee, Jiminny
DeepSeek V4 FlashAvoma alternatives: Chorus by ZoomInfo, Fireflies.ai, Jiminny
Kimi K2Avoma alternatives: Clari Copilot, Fathom, Jiminny
GLM 4.7 FlashXAvoma alternatives: Fathom, Jiminny

Neither was named

5 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5Avoma alternatives: Airspeed, Clari Copilot, HubSpot's CI
GPT-5.4 miniGong alternatives: Chorus by ZoomInfo, Salesloft Conversations
Llama 4 MaverickAvoma
Qwen 3.7 FlashAvoma alternatives: Gong, ZIG
MiniMax M2.5Avoma alternatives: Gong

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Fathom leads by forty points.
Fathom40%#1 of 11
Jiminny0%#– of 11
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Fathom leads by nine points.
Fathom15%#2 of 12
Jiminny7%#5 of 12
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
Fathom0%#12 of 13
Jiminny0%#10 of 13
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Fathom

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.

“useful as a free note-taker, but the comparison warns it is not a replacement for Gong-level deal risk / revenue intelligence” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“Moderate Caution Generally well-regarded but still cloud-based” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · soft negative
“I'd pick Fathom first. It gives you the core value—recording, transcription, summaries, and action items—without the enterprise cost structure” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend starting with Fathom (if video meetings are primary) or Coldread (if phone calls are primary)” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“the best conversation intelligence and call recording platforms are Fathom and Fireflies.ai” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about Jiminny

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.

“start a trial of Avoma ... or Jiminny (if your primary concern is coaching reps)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“That's why Jiminny and Avoma tend to be unusually good fits at this scale” DeepSeek V4 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“Recommended: Jiminny or Avoma for Mid-Sized B2B Companies” DeepSeek V4 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.