HubSpot CRM vs Less Annoying CRM
Seven of fourteen models named HubSpot CRM first on the direct prompt; zero named Less Annoying CRM. HubSpot CRM was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Less Annoying CRM by ten and HubSpot CRM carries 60 labels and Less Annoying CRM 11, so the shares are not directly comparable.
By HubSpot, Cambridge, United States, founded 2006. Named in twenty-one categories this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the CRM page.
By framing
HubSpot CRMFirst choices, of fourteen modelsLess Annoying CRM
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, HubSpot CRM and Less Annoying CRM were named in the same answer thirty-five times, of the 346 answers naming HubSpot CRM and the 36 naming Less Annoying CRM. In those answers Less Annoying CRM took the first choice five times and HubSpot CRM nineteen.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | ||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | ||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | |||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | | |||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | | |
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | | | |
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | | ||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | ||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | |
HubSpot CRM Less Annoying CRM first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, HubSpot CRM on the left and Less Annoying CRM on the right.The direct prompt
HubSpot CRM first, Less Annoying CRM not the choice
7 of 14 modelsLess Annoying CRM was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was named
7 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
HubSpot CRM44%#1 of 8Less Annoying CRM0%#7 of 8HubSpot CRM59%#1 of 9Less Annoying CRM2%#5 of 9HubSpot CRM6%#3 of 8Less Annoying CRM0%#– of 8What the models said about HubSpot CRM
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of five in this category shown.
“Many users report feeling locked into the ecosystem because migrating away from HubSpot is technically difficult and expensive.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Check the *full* price before committing, especially if you need paid features or have a large marketing-contact list.” GPT-6 Luna · negative prompt · soft negative
“For most mid-market B2B companies, HubSpot is the best starting point due to its modern interface, integrated functionality, and reasonable pricing.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · direct prompt · first choice
“Best for: Companies that want speed, ease of use, and strong marketing/sales alignment. Pros: Extremely easy adoption; excellent UI; scales very well.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“HubSpot - a popular CRM choice for small to mid-sized businesses that offers a range of features including marketing and sales tools.” Llama 4 Maverick · paraphrase prompt · first choice
What the models said about Less Annoying CRM
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“For SMBs, consider highly rated alternatives like Less Annoying CRM (minimal complaints)” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · first choice
“Less Annoying CRM is often recommended as the best option for staying within budget” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
“For simple needs: Less Annoying CRM, Nutshell, or Capsule” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.