GTM AI Index
Index Marketing Webinars › Zoho Webinar vs BigMarker
Webinar and virtual event platforms · September 2026 Edition

Zoho Webinar vs BigMarker

Zero of twelve models named Zoho Webinar first on the direct prompt; one named BigMarker. Zoho Webinar was named by nine of the twelve models and BigMarker by eleven and Zoho Webinar carries 11 labels and BigMarker 21, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Zoho Webinar

accepted challenger

By Zoho Office Suite, India, India, founded 1996. Named in one category this edition.

BigMarker

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share11%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%5%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#4#7A position in a field of 19; printed, not drawn.
Labels1121A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Zoho Webinar reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Livestorm was named alongside these two in nine of the twelve direct answers. Livestorm vs Zoho Webinar · Livestorm vs BigMarker · Demio vs Zoho Webinar

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the webinar and virtual event platforms page.

By framing

How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Zoho WebinarFirst choices, of twelve modelsBigMarker
Direct01
Paraphrase00
Comparative00
Budget-constrained50
Scale-constrained00
Negative001 against BigMarker
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.

Every model, every framing

The seventy-two answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Zoho Webinar and BigMarker stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
Zoho Webinar BigMarker first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Zoho Webinar on the left and BigMarker on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Zoho Webinar and BigMarker stood in it.

BigMarker first, Zoho Webinar not the choice

1 of 12 modelsZoho Webinar was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Claude Haiku 4.5BigMarker alternatives: Demio, GoTo Webinar, Goldcast, Livestorm

Neither was the first choice, one was named

1 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Kimi K2Demio, Livestorm alternatives: BigMarker, Goldcast

Neither was named

10 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
GPT-5.4 miniDemio alternatives: ON24
Gemini 3.5 FlashGoldcast alternatives: Airmeet, Demio, Livestorm
Perplexity SonarGoldcast alternatives: Bizzabo, GoTo Webinar, Livestorm
Grok 4.1 FastDemio alternatives: GoTo Webinar, Goldcast, Livestorm, ON24, Zoom Webinars
Mistral SmallGoldcast alternatives: Demio, Livestorm, Zoom Webinars
DeepSeek V4 FlashLivestorm alternatives: Demio, Goldcast
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
Qwen 3.7 FlashGoldcast alternatives: Livestorm, ON24, Zoom Webinars
GLM 4.7 FlashXGoTo Webinar alternatives: Airmeet, ClickMeeting, Cvent, Demio, EventMobi, PheedLoop, WebinarJam, Whova, Zoom Webinars, Zuddl
MiniMax M2.5Demio alternatives: Bizzabo, Goldcast, Livestorm

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Zoho Webinar leads by seven points.
Zoho Webinar7%#6 of 16
BigMarker0%#15 of 16
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Zoho Webinar leads by nine points.
Zoho Webinar11%#4 of 19
BigMarker2%#7 of 19
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: BigMarker leads at enterprise.
BigMarker4%#7 of 16
Zoho Webinar0%#– of 16
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Zoho Webinar

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.

“Top pick for maximum savings: Zoho Meeting — at roughly $8/month with a free tier, it's the clear winner if budget is your #1 concern” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“Zoho Meeting is best for solo operators and small teams on the tightest budget ... at one of the lowest prices” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“Zoho Webinar stands out as the best overall choice for webinars and basic virtual events” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about BigMarker

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.

“BigMarker (poor offer pop-ups, glitchy screen sharing, pricey)” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · soft negative
“Supports live, simulive, automated, and on-demand webinars natively from one platform, and fits mid-market to enterprise teams” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“Choose BigMarker or ON24 if you're running large-scale, highly controlled, analytics-heavy enterprise events” Perplexity Sonar · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Branded automation & series ... Evergreen sessions, custom landing pages | Pricing not transparent” Grok 4.1 Fast · comparative prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.