GTM AI Index
Index Marketing Social media › Agorapulse vs Oktopost
Social media management · September 2026 Edition

Agorapulse vs Oktopost

One of twelve models named Agorapulse first on the direct prompt; two named Oktopost. Agorapulse was named by eleven of the twelve models and Oktopost by ten and Agorapulse carries 36 labels and Oktopost 19, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Agorapulse

accepted challenger

Named in four categories this edition.

Oktopost

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

First-choice share15%9%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%5%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#4A position in a field of 12; printed, not drawn.
Labels3619A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Agorapulse reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Sprout Social was named alongside these two in twelve of the twelve direct answers. Sprout Social vs Agorapulse · Sprout Social vs Oktopost · Buffer vs Agorapulse

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the social media management page.

By framing

How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
AgorapulseFirst choices, of twelve modelsOktopost
Direct12
Paraphrase521 against Oktopost
Comparative00
Budget-constrained00
Scale-constrained10
Negative20
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.

Every model, every framing

The seventy-two answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Agorapulse and Oktopost stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
Agorapulse Oktopost first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Agorapulse on the left and Oktopost on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Agorapulse and Oktopost stood in it.

Agorapulse first, Oktopost not the choice

1 of 12 modelsOktopost was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
GPT-5.4 miniAgorapulse alternatives: Hootsuite, Sprout Social

Oktopost first, Agorapulse an alternative

2 of 12 modelsAgorapulse was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Gemini 3.5 FlashOktopost alternatives: Agorapulse, Hootsuite, HubSpot Social, Sprout Social
Kimi K2Oktopost alternatives: Hootsuite, SocialPilot, Sprout Social

Neither was the first choice, one was named

8 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5Sprout Social alternatives: Hootsuite, Oktopost
Perplexity SonarSprout Social alternatives: Agorapulse, Hootsuite, Oktopost, Sendible, SocialPilot
Grok 4.1 FastSprout Social alternatives: Agorapulse, Buffer, Hootsuite, HubSpot Social, Oktopost, Sendible, SocialPilot
Mistral SmallSprout Social alternatives: Agorapulse, Oktopost
DeepSeek V4 FlashSprout Social alternatives: Agorapulse, Oktopost
Llama 4 MaverickSprout Social alternatives: Oktopost
GLM 4.7 FlashXSprout Social alternatives: Hootsuite, Oktopost
MiniMax M2.5Sprout Social alternatives: Agorapulse, Hootsuite, SocialPilot

Neither was named

1 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Qwen 3.7 FlashSprout Social alternatives: Hootsuite, Sendible

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Agorapulse leads by four points.
Agorapulse7%#4 of 12
Oktopost4%#– of 12
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Agorapulse leads by seven points.
Agorapulse15%#3 of 12
Oktopost9%#4 of 12
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: Oktopost leads at enterprise.
Oktopost15%#3 of 12
Agorapulse0%#12 of 12
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Agorapulse

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.

“Lowest Risk Scores (7/100) - Consider these instead: Agorapulse - Clean record, agency-friendly” Mistral Small · negative prompt · first choice
“Safer alternatives (low risk scores ~7/100, clean records): Agorapulse, SocialPilot” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend Agorapulse as the top social media scheduling and monitoring tool.” Grok 4.1 Fast · paraphrase prompt · first choice

What the models said about Oktopost

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.

“Avoid for Mid-Sized: Oktopost ... better for enterprises” Grok 4.1 Fast · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“If your primary marketing goal is demand generation and tying social media efforts directly to leads, pipeline, and sales, Oktopost is the clear winner.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Oktopost is the premier choice. Unlike generic tools, it was built from the ground up strictly for B2B enterprise and mid-market teams.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend starting with Oktopost if your primary goal is lead generation and tracking ROI through the sales funnel” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.