AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Marketing › Click fraud protection › Fraud Blocker vs Cheq
Click fraud protection · October 2026 Edition

Fraud Blocker vs Cheq

Zero of fourteen models named Fraud Blocker first on the direct prompt; zero named Cheq. Both were named by all fourteen models and Fraud Blocker carries 34 labels and Cheq 27, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Fraud Blocker

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

Cheq

accepted challenger

Named in three categories this edition.

First-choice share8%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate9%11%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#5A position in a field of 9; printed, not drawn.
Labels3427A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Fraud Blocker reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.ClickCease was named alongside these two in thirteen of the fourteen direct answers. ClickCease vs Fraud Blocker · ClickCease vs Cheq · Lunio vs Fraud Blocker

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the click fraud protection page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Fraud BlockerFirst choices, of fourteen modelsCheq
Direct001 against Fraud Blocker
Paraphrase01
Comparative201 against Cheq
Budget-constrained401 against Fraud Blocker
Scale-constrained01
Negative001 against Fraud Blocker · 2 against Cheq
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Fraud Blocker and Cheq were named in the same answer thirty-two times, of the 92 answers naming Fraud Blocker and the 99 naming Cheq. In those answers Cheq took the first choice eight times and Fraud Blocker two.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Fraud Blocker and Cheq stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Fraud Blocker Cheq first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Fraud Blocker on the left and Cheq on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Fraud Blocker and Cheq stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Gemini 3.5 FlashLunio alternatives: Fraud Blocker, TrafficGuard
Mistral SmallClickCease alternatives: Fraud Blocker, Spider AF
Llama 4 MaverickClickCease alternatives: Fraud Blocker

Neither was named

11 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5Lunio alternatives: ClickCease, ClickGUARD, TrafficGuard
GPT-5.4 miniClickCease alternatives: Lunio
Perplexity SonarLunio alternatives: ClickCease, ClickGUARD, TrafficGuard
Grok 4.1 FastClickCease alternatives: ClickGUARD, Lunio
DeepSeek V4 FlashClickCease alternatives: ClickGUARD, Lunio, TrafficGuard
Qwen 3.7 FlashLunio alternatives: ClickCease, ClickGUARD
Kimi K2ClickCease alternatives: ClickGuardian, TrafficGuard
GLM 4.7 FlashXClickCease alternatives: ClickGUARD, ClickPatrol, TrafficGuard
MiniMax M2.5AdWatcher, ClickCease alternatives: ClickPatrol
GPT-6 LunaClickCease alternatives: Lunio
Muse Glimmer 30BClickCease alternatives: Clixtell, Lunio, TrafficGuard

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Fraud Blocker leads by six points.
Fraud Blocker6%#3 of 10
Cheq0%#10 of 10
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Fraud Blocker leads by four points.
Fraud Blocker8%#3 of 9
Cheq4%#5 of 9
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: Cheq leads at enterprise.
Cheq31%#2 of 12
Fraud Blocker4%#5 of 12
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Fraud Blocker

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.

“Fraud Blocker lacks Microsoft Ads coverage; watch for channel gaps matching your needs” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · soft negative
“Worth comparing on price, but less consistently recommended” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · soft negative
“Microsoft Ads important? | Avoid Fraud Blocker” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · soft negative
“Fraud Blocker and ClickPatrol stand out as top choices for small businesses with limited budgets” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
“The best click fraud protection tool for a company with a limited budget is Fraud Blocker.” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
“or Fraud Blocker if you want more comprehensive features at a slightly higher cost” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about Cheq

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.

“CHEQ's detection is tuned for security use cases rather than campaign performance, and ad fraud sits alongside many other modules” Claude Haiku 4.5 · comparative prompt · soft negative
“Mixed evidence makes it a candidate for caution, especially for budget‑constrained advertisers.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · soft negative
“Detection is tuned for security use cases rather than campaign performance” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“The four tools most consistently recommended for enterprise advertisers are Lunio, CHEQ, DataDome, and Anura” DeepSeek V4 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“1. CHEQ - Strongest overall pick” MiniMax M2.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“CHEQ or HUMAN Security are enterprise-grade cybersecurity tools that protect the entire marketing funnel and CRM from bot entries.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.