AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Marketing › Click fraud protection › Cheq vs TrafficGuard
Click fraud protection · October 2026 Edition

Cheq vs TrafficGuard

Zero of fourteen models named Cheq first on the direct prompt; zero named TrafficGuard. Cheq was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and TrafficGuard by thirteen and Cheq carries 27 labels and TrafficGuard 30, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Cheq

accepted challenger

Named in three categories this edition.

TrafficGuard

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

First-choice share4%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate11%3%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#5#7A position in a field of 9; printed, not drawn.
Labels2730A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Cheq reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.ClickCease was named alongside these two in thirteen of the fourteen direct answers. ClickCease vs Cheq · ClickCease vs TrafficGuard · Lunio vs Cheq

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the click fraud protection page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
CheqFirst choices, of fourteen modelsTrafficGuard
Direct00
Paraphrase10
Comparative001 against Cheq
Budget-constrained01
Scale-constrained10
Negative012 against Cheq · 1 against TrafficGuard
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Cheq and TrafficGuard were named in the same answer forty-seven times, of the 99 answers naming Cheq and the 85 naming TrafficGuard. In those answers TrafficGuard took the first choice two times and Cheq ten.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Cheq and TrafficGuard stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Cheq TrafficGuard first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Cheq on the left and TrafficGuard on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Cheq and TrafficGuard stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

7 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5Lunio alternatives: ClickCease, ClickGUARD, TrafficGuard
Gemini 3.5 FlashLunio alternatives: Fraud Blocker, TrafficGuard
Perplexity SonarLunio alternatives: ClickCease, ClickGUARD, TrafficGuard
DeepSeek V4 FlashClickCease alternatives: ClickGUARD, Lunio, TrafficGuard
Kimi K2ClickCease alternatives: ClickGuardian, TrafficGuard
GLM 4.7 FlashXClickCease alternatives: ClickGUARD, ClickPatrol, TrafficGuard
Muse Glimmer 30BClickCease alternatives: Clixtell, Lunio, TrafficGuard

Neither was named

7 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
GPT-5.4 miniClickCease alternatives: Lunio
Grok 4.1 FastClickCease alternatives: ClickGUARD, Lunio
Mistral SmallClickCease alternatives: Fraud Blocker, Spider AF
Llama 4 MaverickClickCease alternatives: Fraud Blocker
Qwen 3.7 FlashLunio alternatives: ClickCease, ClickGUARD
MiniMax M2.5AdWatcher, ClickCease alternatives: ClickPatrol
GPT-6 LunaClickCease alternatives: Lunio

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
TrafficGuard leads by two points.
TrafficGuard2%#7 of 10
Cheq0%#10 of 10
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: Cheq leads at mid-market.
Cheq4%#5 of 9
TrafficGuard2%#7 of 9
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Cheq leads by twenty-nine points.
Cheq31%#2 of 12
TrafficGuard2%#7 of 12
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Cheq

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.

“CHEQ's detection is tuned for security use cases rather than campaign performance, and ad fraud sits alongside many other modules” Claude Haiku 4.5 · comparative prompt · soft negative
“Mixed evidence makes it a candidate for caution, especially for budget‑constrained advertisers.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · soft negative
“Detection is tuned for security use cases rather than campaign performance” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“The four tools most consistently recommended for enterprise advertisers are Lunio, CHEQ, DataDome, and Anura” DeepSeek V4 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“1. CHEQ - Strongest overall pick” MiniMax M2.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“CHEQ or HUMAN Security are enterprise-grade cybersecurity tools that protect the entire marketing funnel and CRM from bot entries.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · alternative

What the models said about TrafficGuard

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.

“Requires careful baselines to avoid false positives during campaigns, has limited coverage detail for proxy and data-center traffic categories” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Go with [ClickFortify](https://clickfortify.com/) or [TrafficGuard's free tier](https://www.trafficguard.ai/)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“choose enterprise-grade, security-first platforms (like *Human Security*, *DataDome*, or *TrafficGuard*)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · first choice
“Best for widest channel coverage: TrafficGuard protects Search, Performance Max, Social, Affiliate, and Mobile from one platform.” Muse Glimmer 30B · direct prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.