Click fraud protection · October 2026 Edition
Lunio vs Fraud Blocker
Four of fourteen models named Lunio first on the direct prompt; zero named Fraud Blocker. Both were named by all fourteen models and Lunio carries 42 labels and Fraud Blocker 34, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
First-choice share20%8%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate7%9%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#3A position in a field of 9; printed, not drawn.
Labels4234A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Lunio reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.ClickCease was named alongside these two in thirteen of the fourteen direct answers. ClickCease vs Lunio · ClickCease vs Fraud Blocker · Lunio vs Clixtell
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the click fraud protection page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
LunioFirst choices, of fourteen modelsFraud Blocker
Direct401 against Fraud Blocker
Paraphrase40
Comparative22
Budget-constrained042 against Lunio · 1 against Fraud Blocker
Scale-constrained20
Negative101 against Lunio · 1 against Fraud Blocker
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Lunio and Fraud Blocker were named in the same answer forty-six times, of the 122 answers naming Lunio and the 92 naming Fraud Blocker. In those answers Fraud Blocker took the first choice five times and Lunio eleven.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Lunio and Fraud Blocker stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | | | | |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | |||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | ||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | |||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | |||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | |
Lunio Fraud Blocker first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Lunio on the left and Fraud Blocker on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Lunio and Fraud Blocker stood in it.
Lunio first, Fraud Blocker an alternative
4 of 14 modelsFraud Blocker was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Claude Haiku 4.5Lunio alternatives: ClickCease, ClickGUARD, TrafficGuard
Gemini 3.5 FlashLunio alternatives: Fraud Blocker, TrafficGuard
Perplexity SonarLunio alternatives: ClickCease, ClickGUARD, TrafficGuard
Qwen 3.7 FlashLunio alternatives: ClickCease, ClickGUARD
Neither was the first choice, one was named
7 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.GPT-5.4 miniClickCease alternatives: Lunio
Grok 4.1 FastClickCease alternatives: ClickGUARD, Lunio
Mistral SmallClickCease alternatives: Fraud Blocker, Spider AF
DeepSeek V4 FlashClickCease alternatives: ClickGUARD, Lunio, TrafficGuard
Llama 4 MaverickClickCease alternatives: Fraud Blocker
GPT-6 LunaClickCease alternatives: Lunio
Muse Glimmer 30BClickCease alternatives: Clixtell, Lunio, TrafficGuard
Neither was named
3 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Kimi K2ClickCease alternatives: ClickGuardian, TrafficGuard
GLM 4.7 FlashXClickCease alternatives: ClickGUARD, ClickPatrol, TrafficGuard
MiniMax M2.5AdWatcher, ClickCease alternatives: ClickPatrol
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Fraud Blocker leads by four points.
Fraud Blocker6%#3 of 10Lunio2%#9 of 10Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: Lunio leads at mid-market.
Lunio20%#2 of 9Fraud Blocker8%#3 of 9Enterprise
Lunio leads by thirty-five points.
Lunio39%#1 of 12Fraud Blocker4%#5 of 12What the models said about Lunio
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“Percentage-of-ad-spend pricing — the more your campaigns grow, the more you pay, which becomes increasingly expensive at scale.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“typically aimed at growing brands rather than the cheapest option | Better if budget is flexible” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · soft negative
“certain enterprise-focused tools like Lunio may not be cost-effective for you” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · soft negative
“Look for tools with strong machine learning engines, real-time blocking, and transparent reporting, such as Lunio, TrafficGuard, CHEQ, DataDome, Anura, or ClickCease.” Mistral Small · negative prompt · first choice
“Lunio is highly regarded for mid-market/enterprise marketing teams. It focuses heavily on maximizing ad efficiency and cleaning up smart bidding signals.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“The four tools most consistently recommended for enterprise advertisers are Lunio, CHEQ, DataDome, and Anura” DeepSeek V4 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
What the models said about Fraud Blocker
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“Fraud Blocker lacks Microsoft Ads coverage; watch for channel gaps matching your needs” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · soft negative
“Worth comparing on price, but less consistently recommended” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · soft negative
“Microsoft Ads important? | Avoid Fraud Blocker” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · soft negative
“Fraud Blocker and ClickPatrol stand out as top choices for small businesses with limited budgets” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
“The best click fraud protection tool for a company with a limited budget is Fraud Blocker.” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
“or Fraud Blocker if you want more comprehensive features at a slightly higher cost” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared
ClickCease vs LunioClickCease vs Fraud BlockerLunio vs ClixtellLunio vs CheqLunio vs ClickPatrolLunio vs TrafficGuardLunio vs ClickGUARDFraud Blocker vs ClixtellFraud Blocker vs CheqFraud Blocker vs ClickPatrolFraud Blocker vs TrafficGuardFraud Blocker vs ClickGUARDAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full click fraud protection standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.