Amplitude vs PostHog
Five of twelve models named Amplitude first on the direct prompt; zero named PostHog. Both were named by all twelve models and Amplitude carries 62 labels and PostHog 56, so the shares are not directly comparable.
United States. Named in nine categories this edition.
Named in seven categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the product analytics page.
By framing
AmplitudeFirst choices, of twelve modelsPostHog
The direct prompt
Amplitude first, PostHog an alternative
5 of 12 modelsPostHog was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
7 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
PostHog43%#1 of 8Amplitude8%#3 of 8Amplitude30%#1 of 8PostHog21%#3 of 8Amplitude49%#1 of 9PostHog0%#5 of 9What the models said about Amplitude
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of six in this category shown.
“Consistently rated as the most expensive option at scale... A poor fit for cost-sensitive teams” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · hard negative
“Steep learning curve with reliance on technical expertise... Pricing is opaque in ways that create unpleasant surprises at scale” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Moderate Caution ... Teams prioritizing analytical depth → Amplitude (accept cloud-only, invest in taxonomy planning)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Choose Amplitude if: You have a mature data culture, need the absolute deepest behavioral cohorting and predictive analytics available, and want built-in experimentation.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“Some of the top product analytics tools include Amplitude, which is best for mid-size to enterprise teams focused on growth and optimization.” Llama 4 Maverick · direct prompt · first choice
“It is arguably the most robust tool for deep-dive analysis... Choose Amplitude if you have a complex product, big data volumes” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
What the models said about PostHog
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of four in this category shown.
“While tools like PostHog are fantastic, choosing to *self-host* them ... can turn into an engineering resource drain.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Moderate Caution ... Teams prioritizing data ownership → PostHog (self-hosted)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Choose PostHog if: You have a developer-heavy culture, want to consolidate product analytics, session replays, and feature flags into a single SDK” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“If you have a technical team and want to get the absolute most value for $0, PostHog is the top choice.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top three products in each category. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.