Five of twelve models named Amplitude first on the direct prompt; five named Mixpanel. Both were named by all twelve models and Amplitude carries 62 labels and Mixpanel 60, so the shares are not directly comparable.
United States. Named in nine categories this edition.
San Francisco, United States, founded 2009. Named in seven categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the product analytics page.
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of six in this category shown.
“Consistently rated as the most expensive option at scale... A poor fit for cost-sensitive teams” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · hard negative
“Steep learning curve with reliance on technical expertise... Pricing is opaque in ways that create unpleasant surprises at scale” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Moderate Caution ... Teams prioritizing analytical depth → Amplitude (accept cloud-only, invest in taxonomy planning)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Choose Amplitude if: You have a mature data culture, need the absolute deepest behavioral cohorting and predictive analytics available, and want built-in experimentation.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“Some of the top product analytics tools include Amplitude, which is best for mid-size to enterprise teams focused on growth and optimization.” Llama 4 Maverick · direct prompt · first choice
“It is arguably the most robust tool for deep-dive analysis... Choose Amplitude if you have a complex product, big data volumes” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.
“Highest Caution: Mixpanel ... When to avoid: If handling sensitive user data or EU users” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · hard negative
“Choose Mixpanel if: You want a highly intuitive, self-serve interface that your non-technical teams will actually use” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“Mixpanel is frequently cited as the best balance of cost, ease of use, and B2B-specific features” Qwen 3.7 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top three products in each category. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.