GTM AI Index
Index GTM data and infrastructure Product analytics › Amplitude vs Mixpanel
Product analytics · September 2026 Edition

Amplitude vs Mixpanel

Five of twelve models named Amplitude first on the direct prompt; five named Mixpanel. Both were named by all twelve models and Amplitude carries 62 labels and Mixpanel 60, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Amplitude

accepted challenger

United States. Named in nine categories this edition.

Mixpanel

accepted challenger

San Francisco, United States, founded 2009. Named in seven categories this edition.

First-choice share30%28%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate21%17%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#2A position in a field of 8; printed, not drawn.
Labels6260A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Amplitude reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Pendo was named alongside these two in ten of the twelve direct answers. Amplitude vs PostHog · Mixpanel vs PostHog

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the product analytics page.

By framing

How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
AmplitudeFirst choices, of twelve modelsMixpanel
Direct55
Paraphrase45
Comparative71
Budget-constrained123 against Amplitude · 1 against Mixpanel
Scale-constrained41
Negative0010 against Amplitude · 9 against Mixpanel
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Amplitude and Mixpanel stood in it.

Amplitude first, Mixpanel an alternative

5 of 12 modelsMixpanel was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
GPT-5.4 miniAmplitude alternatives: Heap, Mixpanel, PostHog
DeepSeek V4 FlashAmplitude alternatives: Mixpanel, Pendo, PostHog
Llama 4 MaverickAmplitude
Qwen 3.7 FlashAmplitude, Pendo alternatives: Heap, Mixpanel
Kimi K2Amplitude alternatives: Heap, Mixpanel, Pendo, PostHog

Mixpanel first, Amplitude an alternative

5 of 12 modelsAmplitude was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Claude Haiku 4.5Mixpanel alternatives: Amplitude, Heap, June, Pendo
Gemini 3.5 FlashMixpanel alternatives: Amplitude, Pendo, PostHog
Perplexity SonarMixpanel alternatives: Amplitude, Heap, Pendo, PostHog
Grok 4.1 FastMixpanel alternatives: Amplitude, Pendo, PostHog
GLM 4.7 FlashXMixpanel alternatives: Amplitude, Heap, Pendo, PostHog

Neither was the first choice, one was named

2 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Mistral SmallAmplitude Analytics alternatives: Mixpanel, Pendo, PostHog
MiniMax M2.5Pendo alternatives: Amplitude, Heap

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Mixpanel leads by twenty-six points.
Mixpanel34%#2 of 8
Amplitude8%#3 of 8
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: Amplitude leads at mid-market.
Amplitude30%#1 of 8
Mixpanel28%#2 of 8
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Amplitude leads by forty-one points.
Amplitude49%#1 of 9
Mixpanel8%#3 of 9
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Amplitude

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of six in this category shown.

“Consistently rated as the most expensive option at scale... A poor fit for cost-sensitive teams” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · hard negative
“Steep learning curve with reliance on technical expertise... Pricing is opaque in ways that create unpleasant surprises at scale” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Moderate Caution ... Teams prioritizing analytical depth → Amplitude (accept cloud-only, invest in taxonomy planning)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Choose Amplitude if: You have a mature data culture, need the absolute deepest behavioral cohorting and predictive analytics available, and want built-in experimentation.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“Some of the top product analytics tools include Amplitude, which is best for mid-size to enterprise teams focused on growth and optimization.” Llama 4 Maverick · direct prompt · first choice
“It is arguably the most robust tool for deep-dive analysis... Choose Amplitude if you have a complex product, big data volumes” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice

What the models said about Mixpanel

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.

“Highest Caution: Mixpanel ... When to avoid: If handling sensitive user data or EU users” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · hard negative
“Choose Mixpanel if: You want a highly intuitive, self-serve interface that your non-technical teams will actually use” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“Mixpanel is frequently cited as the best balance of cost, ease of use, and B2B-specific features” Qwen 3.7 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top three products in each category. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.