ZoomInfo vs Cognism
One of fourteen models named ZoomInfo first on the direct prompt; zero named Cognism. Both were named by all fourteen models and ZoomInfo carries 60 labels and Cognism 48, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Vancouver, Washington, United States, founded 2000. Named in twenty-six categories this edition.
Named in eleven categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the data enrichment page.
By framing
ZoomInfoFirst choices, of fourteen modelsCognism
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, ZoomInfo and Cognism were named in the same answer 360 times, of the 914 answers naming ZoomInfo and the 402 naming Cognism. In those answers Cognism took the first choice twenty times and ZoomInfo eighty-nine.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | | | |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | ||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | |||
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | | |||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | | |
| Kimi K2 | | | | | ||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | | ||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | | ||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | |
ZoomInfo Cognism first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, ZoomInfo on the left and Cognism on the right.The direct prompt
ZoomInfo first, Cognism not the choice
1 of 14 modelsCognism was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
10 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
3 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
ZoomInfo0%#10 of 10Cognism0%#9 of 10What the models said about ZoomInfo
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.
“For most mid-market companies, ZoomInfo is the top all-around choice due to its scale, features, and integration capabilities.” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
“ZoomInfo is the safest pick for a mid-sized B2B company that wants a mature, scalable lead and account enrichment platform.” Perplexity Sonar · paraphrase prompt · first choice
What the models said about Cognism
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.
“often Cognism — both are generally positioned as enterprise tools” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · hard negative
“use European compliance-first data providers like Cognism or Dropcontact, which strictly adhere to GDPR” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · first choice
“Cognism | GDPR/CCPA certified, human-verified mobile numbers” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.