ZoomInfo vs Lusha
One of fourteen models named ZoomInfo first on the direct prompt; zero named Lusha. Both were named by all fourteen models and ZoomInfo carries 60 labels and Lusha 45, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Vancouver, Washington, United States, founded 2000. Named in twenty-six categories this edition.
By Lusha Systems, Boston, United States, founded 2016. Named in five categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the data enrichment page.
By framing
ZoomInfoFirst choices, of fourteen modelsLusha
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, ZoomInfo and Lusha were named in the same answer 253 times, of the 914 answers naming ZoomInfo and the 340 naming Lusha. In those answers Lusha took the first choice twelve times and ZoomInfo forty-five.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | | | |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | ||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | ||
| Mistral Small | | | | | ||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | | |
| Kimi K2 | | | | | ||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | | | |
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | | ||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | ||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | | |
ZoomInfo Lusha first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, ZoomInfo on the left and Lusha on the right.The direct prompt
ZoomInfo first, Lusha not the choice
1 of 14 modelsLusha was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
5 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
8 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
ZoomInfo6%#3 of 12Lusha2%#6 of 12What the models said about ZoomInfo
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.
“For most mid-market companies, ZoomInfo is the top all-around choice due to its scale, features, and integration capabilities.” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
“ZoomInfo is the safest pick for a mid-sized B2B company that wants a mature, scalable lead and account enrichment platform.” Perplexity Sonar · paraphrase prompt · first choice
What the models said about Lusha
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of five in this category shown.
“Low email accuracy: Independent checks suggest only about 68% email return at roughly 82% accuracy, which is below industry standards.” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“Tools that have faced regulatory actions (e.g., Lusha's Italy fine) should be avoided in sensitive jurisdictions.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · hard negative
“Some users report issues with outdated contact information and relatively high pricing for infrequent use.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Safer bets from reviews: Tools like Lusha (98% email accuracy, free tier)” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · first choice
“Apollo.io or Lusha are the right entry points. Both offer free tiers” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.