Amplemarket vs Cleanlist
One of twelve models named Amplemarket first on the direct prompt; two named Cleanlist. Amplemarket was named by ten of the twelve models and Cleanlist by eight and Amplemarket carries 21 labels and Cleanlist 20, so the shares are not directly comparable.
United States. Named in five categories this edition.
Named in six categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the data enrichment page.
By framing
AmplemarketFirst choices, of twelve modelsCleanlist
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | |||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | |||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | | |||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | |||||
| Kimi K2 | | | ||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | |||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | |
Amplemarket Cleanlist first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Amplemarket on the left and Cleanlist on the right.The direct prompt
Amplemarket first, Cleanlist not the choice
1 of 12 modelsCleanlist was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Cleanlist first, Amplemarket an alternative
2 of 12 modelsAmplemarket was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
3 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
6 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Amplemarket2%#– of 10Cleanlist0%#7 of 10Amplemarket7%#3 of 10Cleanlist4%#5 of 10Amplemarket12%#3 of 9Cleanlist2%#– of 9What the models said about Amplemarket
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of five in this category shown.
“Pros: Top scores (29/30 data). Cons: Higher cost.” Grok 4.1 Fast · direct prompt · soft negative
“High entry (~$7K/year min, annual only)” Grok 4.1 Fast · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Amplemarket is the best overall tool, offering high-accuracy enrichment with AI, engagement, deliverability, and intent signals in one platform.” Llama 4 Maverick · comparative prompt · first choice
“For mid-market companies, Apollo.io, Amplemarket, or Cognism offer a good balance of features and price depending on geography.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“some recommended tools include: Amplemarket: Offers curated multi-source enrichment, high accuracy, and engagement data.” Llama 4 Maverick · negative prompt · first choice
What the models said about Cleanlist
No label in this category carried a quote.
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.