GTM AI Index
Index GTM data and infrastructure Customer intel › Amplitude vs Hightouch
Customer intelligence and data science · September 2026 Edition

Amplitude vs Hightouch

Zero of twelve models named Amplitude first on the direct prompt; one named Hightouch. Amplitude was named by twelve of the twelve models and Hightouch by eight and Amplitude carries 38 labels and Hightouch 14, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Amplitude

accepted challenger

United States. Named in nine categories this edition.

Hightouch

accepted challenger

Named in six categories this edition.

First-choice share6%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate16%14%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#6A position in a field of 14; printed, not drawn.
Labels3814A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Amplitude reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Google Analytics 4 vs Amplitude · Google Analytics 4 vs Hightouch · Segment vs Amplitude

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the customer intelligence and data science page.

By framing

How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
AmplitudeFirst choices, of twelve modelsHightouch
Direct011 against Amplitude
Paraphrase30
Comparative40
Budget-constrained002 against Amplitude
Scale-constrained00
Negative003 against Amplitude · 2 against Hightouch
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.

Every model, every framing

The seventy-two answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Amplitude and Hightouch stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
Amplitude Hightouch first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Amplitude on the left and Hightouch on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Amplitude and Hightouch stood in it.

Hightouch first, Amplitude not the choice

1 of 12 modelsAmplitude was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Mistral SmallHightouch, Segment alternatives: Planhat, Tealium

Neither was the first choice, one was named

5 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Gemini 3.5 FlashChurnZero alternatives: 6sense, Hightouch, HockeyStack, HubSpot Breeze Intelligence, Mixpanel, Oliv, PostHog, Vitally
Perplexity SonarSegment alternatives: ChurnZero, Contentsquare, Hightouch, Outreach, Tealium
Grok 4.1 FastSegment alternatives: Hightouch, ZoomInfo
Qwen 3.7 FlashGong, HubSpot, Mixpanel alternatives: Amplitude, Clari Copilot, Gainsight, Hightouch, PostHog, Segment, Totango
Kimi K2HubSpot Operations Hub + Breeze AI alternatives: 6sense, Amplitude, Avoma, Clari Copilot, Mixpanel

Neither was named

6 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5Gainsight alternatives: Crunchbase, Demandbase
GPT-5.4 miniMicrosoft Dynamics 365 Customer Insights alternatives: 6sense, Adobe Real-Time CDP, Salesforce CRM Analytics
DeepSeek V4 FlashVitally alternatives: Apollo.io, Planhat, Salesmotion
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
GLM 4.7 FlashXBuildBetter, Segment alternatives: Enterpret, HubSpot Marketing Hub, Salesforce Data Cloud
MiniMax M2.5HyperOrbit, Planhat alternatives: Chattermill, Thematic, Unwrap

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Amplitude leads by six points.
Amplitude6%#5 of 10
Hightouch0%#– of 10
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Amplitude leads by four points.
Amplitude6%#3 of 14
Hightouch2%#6 of 14
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Amplitude leads by seven points.
Amplitude7%#2 of 14
Hightouch0%#10 of 14
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Amplitude

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.

“Who should avoid them: Startups without dedicated developers to write tracking code” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“I'd usually recommend Amplitude if your main goal is to understand and improve the digital customer journey” GPT-5.4 mini · paraphrase prompt · first choice

What the models said about Hightouch

No label in this category carried a quote.

Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.