GTM AI Index

Index › Vendors › Ripoff Report · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Ripoff Report

4Judge labels

0First choices

4Negative labels

3 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

1 label, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Ripoff Report was named 1 time in Feedback, where Google Forms led with 15%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business77 of 85

under the label threshold

Mid-market103 of 104

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In feedback · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Ripoff Report for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Customer feedback and surveys	Customer	0%	103 of 104	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Google Forms at 15%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Ripoff Report yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Ripoff Report across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative4 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative4 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“widely described as difficult to deal with by design, making it risky” Perplexity Sonar · Feedback · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Ripoff Report, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Ripoff Report was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Delighted2 of 40Not in the top three

Sitejabber2 of 40Not in the top three

SurveyMonkey2 of 40Not in the top three

Trustpilot2 of 40Not in the top three

Typeform2 of 40Not in the top three

Google Business Profile1 of 41Not in the top three

ReviewGrower1 of 41Not in the top three

Angi1 of 40Not in the top three

Avvo1 of 40Not in the top three

BBB1 of 40Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Ripoff Report. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 4 answers that named Ripoff Report and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

alchemer.com2

asknicely.com2

compasly.com2

front.com2

ftc.gov2

getperspective.ai2

greatquestion.co2

interactionmetrics.com2

nadernejadmedia.com2

optimizeup.com2

Twenty of the twenty domain citations in answers naming Ripoff Report came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

alchemer.com/resources/e-guide/the-marketers-guide-to-choosing-the-best-customer-feedback-2

asknicely.com/blog/customer-feedback-management-software2

asknicely.com/blog/happyornot-alternatives2

compasly.com/en/blog/trustpilot-alternatives-20262

front.com/blog/customer-feedback-software2

ftc.gov/business-guidance/resources/featuring-online-customer-reviews-guide-platforms2

getperspective.ai/blog/customer-feedback-management-software-2026-10-platforms-ranked2

greatquestion.co/blog/customer-feedback-tools2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

The company

Ripoff Report.

Website: ripoffreport.com
Founded: 1998

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Ripoff Report's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Ripoff Report, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at ripoffreport.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.