Small businessgoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsNot ranked
1 category · Named, not rankedReclaim.ai
6Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
6 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
4 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Reclaim.ai was named 4 times in Scheduling, where Calendly led with 36%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market19 of 58
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise20 of 64
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
In scheduling · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Reclaim.ai for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meeting scheduling | Sales | 0% | 19 of 58 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Calendly at 36% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Reclaim.ai held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Scheduling · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 8 → 17 of 55
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 12 → 18 of 58
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scheduling | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 8 → 19 of 58 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Reclaim.ai across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Reclaim.ai across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative4 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative6 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Reclaim operates similarly to Motion but focuses heavily on personal productivity and habit tracking alongside scheduling.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Scheduling · comparative prompt · alternative
“Best For: Solopreneurs and busy professionals who want their schedule actively managed by AI.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Scheduling · comparative prompt · alternative
“AI-powered calendar defense | Focus on protecting your time/data” Kimi K2 · Scheduling · negative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Reclaim.ai, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Reclaim.ai was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Reclaim.ai, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Reclaim.ai was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Reclaim.ai. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 6 answers that named Reclaim.ai and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
cal.com3
koalendar.com2
kumospace.com2
larksuite.com2
peoplemanagingpeople.com2
serviceform.com2
worldmetrics.org2
zapier.com2
zoho.com2
aiproductivity.ai1
Twenty of the twenty domain citations in answers naming Reclaim.ai came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
reclaim.ai is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Reclaim.ai takes 0% of first choices and Calendly takes 36%.ShowHide
Search and answers
reclaim.ai is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Reclaim.ai takes 0% of first choices and Calendly takes 36%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “meeting scheduling tool for sales teams”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best meeting scheduling tool for sales teams”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 5,400 a month (“reclaim.ai”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 6 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 143,629 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 14,696 · 678 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 9,328
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 19 of 58 in scheduling
Segment leader
36%
Calendly
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 6 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 5 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on reclaim.ai
969
subdomains included
Content
599
counted in the table below
Documentation
229
Product · Integration
13 · 15
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 269 | 6 | 2026-08-17 | Scheduling | |
| News or press | 155 | 0 | 2026-06-04 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 126 | 0 | 2026-06-29 | ||
| Comparison | 38 | 2 | 2026-08-05 | ||
| Case study | 6 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 2 | 1 | 2026-08-04 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 1 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 1 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-08-17Burnout trends report blog
- 2026-08-056516309 when to use calendar sync vs connected calendars comparison
- 2026-08-048295664 okta sso setup guide bookmark app report or ebook
- 2026-08-049105683 sso authentication options google vs sso provider only forced sso comparison
- 2026-07-22Ai assistant apps blog
- 2026-07-17Affiliate marketing benefits blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page reclaim.ai exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Reclaim.ai
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Reclaim.ai; a claim can dispute any of them.
Reclaim 1
Follow Reclaim.ai
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Reclaim.ai is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Reclaim.ai is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- The AI calendar assistant that helps organizations move from reactive scheduling to proactive time optimization.
- For
- organizations, from individuals to company-wide enterprise deployments
- Price stated
- Individuals can enjoy our amazing free Lite plan forever - no credit card required. We’re able to offer Reclaim features for free because our users love it so much that they tell friends and coworkers about it, which drives interest in our premium plans. For people, teams, and organizations that need more AI scheduling power, we offer incredibly affordable Starter, Business and Enterprise plans. All users get a free 14-day trial of our Business plan. reclaim.ai
- Starting price
- Free reclaim.ai/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- free Lite plan forever; free 14-day trial of our Business plan reclaim.ai
- Integrations claimed
- 6 reclaim.ai/features/tasks
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type IIGDPRDPFCCPAEU-US DPFSOC 2SOC 2 Type 2
- Customers named
- 1passwordallcloudSnykGrafana LabsGitHubSalesforceAirbnbblueprinthr.co
- Not stated on the pages read
- Hosting
What Reclaim.ai's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: reclaim.ai, reclaim.ai/pricing, trust.reclaim.ai, reclaim.ai/features/tasks, reclaim.ai/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Reclaim.ai's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Reclaim.ai, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Reclaim.ai by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Reclaim.ai is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Reclaim.ai, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.