GTM AI Index

Index › Products › ProfitWell Metrics · October 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

ProfitWell Metrics

4Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

4 / 14Models named it

2Categories

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

2 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. ProfitWell Metrics was named 2 times in Pricing optimization and 1 other category, where Pricefx led with 53%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business30 of 98

under the label threshold

Mid-market58 of 76

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In pricing optimization · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named ProfitWell Metrics for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Pricing optimization	Revenue operations	0%	58 of 76	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Pricefx at 53%
Revenue intelligence and forecasting	Sales	0%	43 of 76	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Clari Copilot at 28%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for ProfitWell Metrics yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated ProfitWell Metrics across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.20	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative4 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Start free: Use ProfitWell Metrics or ChartMogul's free tier” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Revenue intel · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as ProfitWell Metrics, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ProfitWell Metrics was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Price2Spy2 of 41Not among the top eight

Prisync2 of 41Not among the top eight

PROS Smart Price Optimization & Management2 of 40Not among the top eight

Zilliant2 of 40Not among the top eight

Baremetrics1 of 41Not among the top eight

Anaplan1 of 40Not among the top eight

Aviso1 of 40Not among the top eight

ChartMogul1 of 40Not among the top eight

Clari Copilot1 of 40Not among the top eight

Competera1 of 40Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ProfitWell Metrics. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 4 answers that named ProfitWell Metrics and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

croclub.com2

paddle.comYour site2

price2spy.com2

prisync.com2

sourceforge.net2

avoma.com1

baremetrics.com1

bizclearai.com1

blog.hubspot.com1

capterra.ca1

Thirteen of the fifteen domain citations in answers naming ProfitWell Metrics came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

avoma.com/blog/best-revenue-intelligence-software1

avoma.com/blog/sales-forecasting-tools1

baremetrics.com/blog/top-forecasting-software-for-saas-businesses1

bizclearai.com/blog/best-ai-tools-small-business-pricing1

blog.hubspot.com/sales/sales-forecasting-software1

capterra.ca/directory/10064/pricing-optimization/software1

capterra.com/p/160394/PriceBeam-Advanced1

centsight.com/blog/financial-forecasting-software1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

paddle.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, ProfitWell Metrics takes 0% of first choices and Pricefx takes 53%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “best pricing optimization platform”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 10 a month (“profitwell metrics”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 0 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 172,079 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 13,558 · 1,973 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 18,823
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

77 ads · 64 text, 8 video, 5 image · 31 shown in the last 30 days

First shown March 2025, as PADDLE.COM MARKET LIMITED, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 53 in the year, 24 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 58 of 76 in pricing optimization

Segment leader

53%

Pricefx

First choices: 0 across its categories
Named in: 4 answers
Its own site cited: in 4 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on paddle.com

2,201

subdomains included

Content

749

counted in the table below

Documentation

1,029

Product · Integration

16 · 18

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	444	16	2026-09-10	ABM, Mobile apps
Case study	86	undated
Webinar or virtual event	80	undated
Comparison	54	0	2025-11-04
Glossary or explainer	30	3	2026-09-29
Conference or event	29	0	2026-04-24
Report or ebook	21	1	2026-09-22
Template or tool	4	0	2023-07-27
News or press	1	undated

Most recent

2026-09-29Feature comparison glossary or explainer
2026-09-29Pathways glossary or explainer
2026-09-22Subscriptions report or ebook
2026-09-10Payments in singapore blog
2026-09-10Payments in india blog
2026-09-10Payments in brazil blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page paddle.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow ProfitWell Metrics

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ProfitWell Metrics's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ProfitWell Metrics, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for ProfitWell Metrics by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where ProfitWell Metrics is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name ProfitWell Metrics, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.