Index › Products › OrderMS · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

OrderMS

4Judge labels

1First choices

0Negative labels

4 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

2 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. OrderMS was named 2 times in Order management, where Zoho Inventory led with 25%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business14 of 113

under the label threshold

Mid-market36 of 131

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In order management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named OrderMS for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Order management systems	Revenue operations	0%	36 of 131	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Zoho Inventory at 25%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for OrderMS yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated OrderMS across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	1	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained4 labels1

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative4 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“With OrderMS, you can process 20 orders every month for FREE, making it perfect for low-order businesses.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Order management · budget prompt · alternative

“Pick OrderMS Free/Startup only if you have a very small team and want a free tier” GPT-5.4 mini · Order management · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as OrderMS, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and OrderMS was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Zoho Inventory4 of 43Not among the top eight

Veeqo1 of 41Not among the top eight

Google Forms1 of 40Not among the top eight

MRPeasy1 of 40Not among the top eight

Odoo1 of 40Not among the top eight

OpenOMS1 of 40Not among the top eight

Orderhive1 of 40Not among the top eight

Pirate Ship1 of 40Not among the top eight

QuickBooks Commerce1 of 40Not among the top eight

QuickBooks Online1 of 40Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named OrderMS. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 4 answers that named OrderMS and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

capterra.com4

crazyegg.com3

g2.com3

theretailexec.com3

zite.com3

learn.g2.com2

mrpeasy.com2

clickup.com1

cybernews.com1

fynd.com1

No domain is on file for OrderMS, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

capterra.com/resources/best-order-management-software-small-business4

crazyegg.com/blog/best-order-management-software3

zite.com/blog/order-management-software3

g2.com/categories/order-management/small-business2

learn.g2.com/best-order-management-software2

mrpeasy.com/blog/best-order-management-software2

capterra.com/order-management-software1

clickup.com/blog/order-management-software1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as OrderMS

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as OrderMS; a claim can dispute any of them.

OrderMS Free/Startup 1

Follow OrderMS

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when OrderMS's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as OrderMS, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for OrderMS by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where OrderMS is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name OrderMS, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.