Index › Products › Orderhive · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Orderhive

7Judge labels

0First choices

1Negative labels

4 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Orderhive was named 3 times in Order management, where Zoho Inventory led with 25%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business48 of 113

under the label threshold

Mid-market35 of 131

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In order management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Orderhive for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Order management systems	Revenue operations	0%	35 of 131	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Zoho Inventory at 25%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Orderhive yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Orderhive across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained5 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative7 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Orderhive and ShipStation are frequently called out for affordable pricing and automation for small businesses” Muse Glimmer 30B · Order management · budget prompt · alternative

“Consider Orderhive if you need marketplace management” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Order management · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Orderhive, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Orderhive was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Zoho Inventory7 of 75Not among the top eight

QuickBooks Commerce3 of 71Not among the top eight

ShipStation3 of 70Not among the top eight

inFlow Inventory3 of 70Not among the top eight

Square for Retail2 of 70Not among the top eight

Veeqo2 of 70Not among the top eight

Brightpearl1 of 70Not among the top eight

Cin7 Core1 of 70Not among the top eight

Dolibarr1 of 70Not among the top eight

Linnworks1 of 70Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Orderhive. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 6 of the 7 answers that named Orderhive and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

capterra.com5

theretailexec.com5

mrpeasy.com4

zite.com4

fynd.com3

learn.g2.com3

devopsschool.com2

emelia.io2

g2.com2

larksuite.com2

No domain is on file for Orderhive, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

capterra.com/resources/best-order-management-software-small-business4

mrpeasy.com/blog/best-order-management-software4

zite.com/blog/order-management-software4

fynd.com/en-gb/blog/order-management-solutions3

learn.g2.com/best-order-management-software3

theretailexec.com/tools/best-free-order-management-software3

devopsschool.com/blog/top-10-order-management-systems-tools-in-2025-features-pros-cons-com2

emelia.io/hub/order-management-software-tools2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Follow Orderhive

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Orderhive's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Orderhive, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Orderhive by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Orderhive is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Orderhive, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.