AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Linnworks · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Linnworks

22Judge labels
2First choices
2Negative labels
9 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
4% in Order management for small business buyers
Rank 26 of 131 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 5 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In order management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Linnworks for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Order management systemsRevenue operations0%26 of 1310%5under 10 labels · led by Zoho Inventory at 25%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Linnworks yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Linnworks across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast01001
Mistral Small00101
DeepSeek V4 Flash01001
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX01001
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B01001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct6 labelsNone
Paraphrase5 labels2
Comparative6 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative22 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best for: High-volume marketplace sellers (Amazon, eBay, etc.)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Order management · comparative prompt · alternative
“Linnworks — Best Multichannel OMS for Mid-Market Ecommerce” Muse Glimmer 30B · Order management · direct prompt · alternative
“For Multi-Channel Ecommerce Sellers: Linnworks” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Order management · comparative prompt · alternative
“Marketplace sync (Amazon, eBay, Shopify).” Grok 4.1 Fast · Order management · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Linnworks, over the 22 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Linnworks was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Zoho Inventory10 of 224Not among the top eight
Cin710 of 220Not among the top eight
Veeqo9 of 220Not among the top eight
Salesforce Order Management8 of 221Not among the top eight
NetSuite Order Management7 of 221Not among the top eight
Brightpearl7 of 220Not among the top eight
Shopify OMS5 of 221Not among the top eight
ShipStation5 of 220Not among the top eight
Cin7 Core4 of 221Not among the top eight
Cin7 Omni4 of 221Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Linnworks. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 20 of the 22 answers that named Linnworks and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

learn.g2.com13
capterra.com12
shopify.com11
clickup.com10
theretailexec.com10
spotsaas.com8
monday.com6
resources.rework.com6
afosto.com5
g2.com5

Eighty-six of the eighty-six domain citations in answers naming Linnworks came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

linnworks.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Linnworks takes 0% of first choices and Zoho Inventory takes 25%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “order management system”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best order management system”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
1,300 a month (“linnworks”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
15 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 22,395 a month
Searches its site ranks for
9,277 · 95 in the top three
Sites linking to it
4,054
Paid Google search
1 searches its ads show for, about 5 clicks and $191 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
70 ads · 43 text, 16 image, 11 video · 14 shown in the last 30 days

First shown June 2023, as SKUVAULT INC, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 40 in the year, 30 before. 1 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 26 of 131 in order management
Segment leader
25%
Zoho Inventory
First choices
2 across its categories
Named in
22 answers
Its own site cited
in 20 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on linnworks.com
1,621
subdomains included
Content
1,302
counted in the table below
Documentation
2
Product · Integration
14 · 192
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog753222026-09-30Ecommerce, SEO
Webinar or virtual event13532026-09-02
News or press9212026-08-03
Case study8132026-09-22
Podcast or video7502025-11-21
Report or ebook7042026-10-02
Comparison5032026-09-02CRM
Glossary or explainer2202026-07-01
Conference or event2102025-03-11
Template or tool3undated

Events in person

Upcoming
  • October 7, 2026 to October 8, 2026DELIVER AmericaCaesars Forum, Las Vegas · exhibits
Last twelve months
  • May 20, 2026 to May 21, 2026The LeadThe Lead, New York City · attended

As the event pages on linnworks.com state them, read October 5, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page linnworks.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Linnworks

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Linnworks's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Linnworks, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Linnworks by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Linnworks is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Linnworks, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at linnworks.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.