GTM AI Index

Index › Products › Omnia Retail · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Omnia Retail

9Judge labels

0First choices

1Negative labels

5 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

4 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Omnia Retail was named 4 times in Pricing optimization, where Pricefx led with 53%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business73 of 98

under the label threshold

Mid-market20 of 76

under the label threshold

Enterprise18 of 58

under the label threshold

In pricing optimization · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Omnia Retail for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Pricing optimization	Revenue operations	0%	20 of 76	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by Pricefx at 53%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Omnia Retail yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Omnia Retail across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	1	1
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative7 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative9 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Competera and Omnia Retail bring AI-driven dynamic pricing to mid-market and omnichannel retailers” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Pricing optimization · comparative prompt · alternative

“Choose Omnia Retail if you need visual, omnichannel dynamic pricing logic” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Pricing optimization · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Omnia Retail, over the 9 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Omnia Retail was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Prisync8 of 93Not among the top eight

Pricefx8 of 92Not among the top eight

Competera8 of 91Not among the top eight

Vendavo8 of 91Not among the top eight

PROS Smart Price Optimization & Management7 of 92Not among the top eight

Zilliant5 of 90Not among the top eight

Price2Spy4 of 90Not among the top eight

Intelligence Node3 of 90Not among the top eight

Wiser3 of 90Not among the top eight

Conga Price Optimization & Management1 of 91Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Omnia Retail. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 9 of the 9 answers that named Omnia Retail and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

guideflow.com6

devopsschool.com5

articsledge.com4

dupple.com4

toolradar.com4

gitnux.org3

pros.com3

vendavo.com3

wifitalents.com3

zipdo.co3

Thirty-eight of the thirty-eight domain citations in answers naming Omnia Retail came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

guideflow.com/blog/price-optimization-software5

articsledge.com/post/best-ai-pricing-tools4

dupple.com/learn/best-ai-price-optimization-tools4

guideflow.com/blog/best-pricing-software4

devopsschool.com/blog/top-10-ai-pricing-optimization-platforms-features-pros-cons-comparis3

toolradar.com/best/pricing-optimization3

articsledge.com/post/best-dynamic-pricing-software-for-small-business-sales-teams2

gitnux.org/best/pricing-optimization-software2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

omniaretail.com ranks 8 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Omnia Retail takes 0% of first choices and Pricefx takes 53%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “best pricing optimization platform”

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 20 of 76 in pricing optimization

Segment leader

53%

Pricefx

First choices: 0 across its categories
Named in: 9 answers
Its own site cited: in 9 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Follow Omnia Retail

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Omnia Retail's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Omnia Retail, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Omnia Retail by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Omnia Retail is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Omnia Retail, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.