GTM AI Index

Index › Vendors › NetCommissions · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

NetCommissions

10Judge labels

0First choices

10Negative labels

6 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

2 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. NetCommissions was named 2 times in Commissions, where Everstage led with 25%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business50 of 57

under the label threshold

Mid-market45 of 51

under the label threshold

Enterprise57 of 59

under the label threshold

In commissions · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named NetCommissions for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Sales commissions and incentive compensation	Revenue operations	0%	45 of 51	100%	2	under 10 labels · led by Everstage at 25%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for NetCommissions yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated NetCommissions across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative10 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative10 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Limited integration options, steep learning curve, high costs, long implementation times (6+ months)” Mistral Small · Commissions · negative prompt · hard negative

“G2 ratings described as "Mixed to Negative"” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Commissions · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as NetCommissions, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and NetCommissions was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Core Commissions9 of 100Not in the top three

Model N9 of 100Not in the top three

Easy-Commission7 of 100Not in the top three

CaptivateIQ6 of 102Not in the top three

SAP Commissions6 of 100Not in the top three

Everstage5 of 101Not in the top three

Anaplan5 of 100Not in the top three

Varicent5 of 100Not in the top three

incentX5 of 100Not in the top three

QuotaPath4 of 102Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when NetCommissions's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as NetCommissions, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at netcommissions.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.