GTM AI Index

Index › Vendors › Model N · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Model N

17Judge labels

0First choices

14Negative labels

7 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

4 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Model N was named 4 times in Commissions, where Everstage led with 25%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business52 of 57

under the label threshold

Mid-market48 of 51

under the label threshold

Enterprise58 of 59

under the label threshold

In commissions · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Model N for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Sales commissions and incentive compensation	Revenue operations	0%	48 of 51	100%	4	under 10 labels · led by Everstage at 25%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Model N yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Model N across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1
Mistral Small	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative3 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative14 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative17 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Platforms with Major Red Flags... Model N... Implementation difficulty, complex integrations, performance bottlenecks” Mistral Small · Commissions · negative prompt · hard negative

“Sparse reviews highlight integration failures, manual workarounds, poor support—skip unless exact fit.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Commissions · negative prompt · soft negative

“Often require 6+ month rollouts that still deliver broken workflows” MiniMax M2.5 · Commissions · negative prompt · soft negative

“Implementation difficulty — complex and time-consuming setup” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Commissions · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Model N, over the 17 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Model N was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

CaptivateIQ9 of 172Not in the top three

Core Commissions9 of 170Not in the top three

NetCommissions9 of 170Not in the top three

Everstage7 of 172Not in the top three

SAP Commissions7 of 170Not in the top three

Anaplan6 of 170Not in the top three

Easy-Commission6 of 170Not in the top three

Javelin6 of 170Not in the top three

Salesforce Spiff6 of 170Not in the top three

QuotaPath5 of 173Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Model N's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Model N, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at modeln.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.