AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › LinkedIn's native "My Company" tab · October 2026 Edition
LinkedIn · 1 category · Named, not ranked

LinkedIn's native "My Company" tab

4Judge labels
1First choices
0Negative labels
3 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. LinkedIn's native "My Company" tab was named 3 times in Employee advocacy, where DSMN8 led with 21%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In employee advocacy · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named LinkedIn's native "My Company" tab for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Employee advocacy platformsMarketing2%11 of 640%3under 10 labels · led by DSMN8 at 21%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for LinkedIn's native "My Company" tab yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated LinkedIn's native "My Company" tab across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501001
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast10001
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B01001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained4 labels1
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative4 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Top Recommendation: LinkedIn's Native "My Company" Tab (Free)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Employee advocacy · budget prompt · first choice
“the most effective free option that allows admins to recommend posts directly to employees at no cost” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Employee advocacy · budget prompt · alternative
“This is an excellent free starting point for small teams.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Employee advocacy · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as LinkedIn's native "My Company" tab, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and LinkedIn's native "My Company" tab was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
EveryoneSocial3 of 42Not among the top eight
Sociuu3 of 40Not among the top eight
Postbeam2 of 40Not among the top eight
Social Champ2 of 40Not among the top eight
Taplio2 of 40Not among the top eight
Bambu1 of 41Not among the top eight
Agorapulse's Easy Advocacy1 of 40Not among the top eight
AuthoredUp1 of 40Not among the top eight
Clearview Social1 of 40Not among the top eight
Hootsuite Amplify1 of 40Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named LinkedIn's native "My Company" tab. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 4 answers that named LinkedIn's native "My Company" tab and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

blog.hootsuite.com4
guideflow.com4
sproutsocial.com4
taplio.com4
authoredup.com3
flockler.com3
g2.com3
mailmodo.com2
postbeam.ai2
referralrock.com2

Thirty-one of the thirty-one domain citations in answers naming LinkedIn's native "My Company" tab came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as LinkedIn's native "My Company" tab

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as LinkedIn's native "My Company" tab; a claim can dispute any of them.
LinkedIn's Native "My Company" Tab 1

Follow LinkedIn's native "My Company" tab

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

LinkedIn is the company behind LinkedIn's native "My Company" tab.
ShowHide

On record

Wikidata
Headquarters
Sunnyvale, United States
Founded
2002

Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when LinkedIn's native "My Company" tab's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as LinkedIn's native "My Company" tab, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for LinkedIn's native "My Company" tab by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where LinkedIn's native "My Company" tab is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name LinkedIn's native "My Company" tab, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at linkedin.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.