GTM AI Index

Index › Vendors › Integrate.io · September 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

Integrate.io

17Judge labels

1First choices

3Negative labels

10 of 12Models named it

2Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

6 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Integrate.io was named 6 times in CRM data quality and 1 other category, where Insycle led with 34%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business77 of 115

under the label threshold

Mid-market29 of 104

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In crm data quality · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Integrate.io for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
CRM data quality and deduplication	Revenue operations	0%	29 of 104	20%	5	under 10 labels · led by Insycle at 34%
Data warehouse and reverse ETL for marketing	GTM data and infrastructure	0%	58 of 100	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Hightouch at 42%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Integrate.io yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Integrate.io across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 label1

Paraphrase4 labelsNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained3 labelsNone

Negative7 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative17 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“best if your data problems start before the CRM” Perplexity Sonar · CRM data quality · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Best for complex in-pipeline cleansing scenarios” Qwen 3.7 Flash · CRM data quality · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Best for Pipeline Cleansing at Scale” GLM 4.7 FlashX · CRM data quality · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Overkill for basic needs” Kimi K2 · CRM data quality · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Integrate.io, over the 17 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Integrate.io was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Cleanlist6 of 173Not in the top three

Hightouch5 of 173Not in the top three

Census5 of 170Not in the top three

DemandTools5 of 170Not in the top three

Fivetran5 of 170Not in the top three

Snowflake5 of 170Not in the top three

BigQuery4 of 172Not in the top three

Insycle4 of 171Not in the top three

ZoomInfo Operations4 of 171Not in the top three

Clearout4 of 170Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Integrate.io. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 17 answers that named Integrate.io and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

integrate.ioYour site2

apollo.io1

ask-luca.com1

cleanlist.ai1

clearout.io1

cognism.com1

cometly.com1

darwinapps.com1

datablist.com1

datacamp.com1

Nine of the eleven domain citations in answers naming Integrate.io came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

apollo.io/insights/best-tool-for-cleaning-and-enriching-crm-data1

ask-luca.com/blogs/best-reverse-etl-tools1

cleanlist.ai/blog/2026-03-27-data-quality-tools1

cleanlist.ai/blog/2026-05-12-best-database-cleaning-software1

clearout.io/blog/crm-data-cleaning-solutions1

cognism.com/blog/data-cleansing-tools1

cometly.com/post/marketing-data-warehouse-solutions1

darwinapps.com/blog/9-best-reverse-etl-tools-for-crm-and-ad-platform-sync-in-20261

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Integrate.io's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Integrate.io, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at integrate.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.