GTM AI Index

Index › Vendors › Helical Insight · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Helical Insight

3Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

3 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

1 label, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Helical Insight was named 1 time in BI & dashboards, where Microsoft Power BI led with 62%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market29 of 73

under the label threshold

Enterprise19 of 61

under the label threshold

In bi & dashboards · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Helical Insight for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Dashboards and data visualization	GTM data and infrastructure	0%	29 of 73	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Power BI at 62%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Helical Insight yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Helical Insight across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative3 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Switch to Power BI paginated reports or open-source like Helical Insight for pixel-perfect needs.” Grok 4.1 Fast · BI & dashboards · negative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Helical Insight, over the 3 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Helical Insight was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Microsoft Power BI3 of 33Not in the top three

Metabase2 of 30Not in the top three

Tableau2 of 30Not in the top three

Apache Superset1 of 30Not in the top three

BIRT1 of 30Not in the top three

Crystal Reports1 of 30Not in the top three

Domo1 of 30Not in the top three

JasperReports1 of 30Not in the top three

Looker1 of 30Not in the top three

Pentaho1 of 30Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Helical Insight. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 1 of the 3 answers that named Helical Insight and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

basedash.com1

bi4saas.com1

dashboardfox.com1

definite.app1

embeddable.com1

fanruan.com1

getlago.com1

helicalinsight.comYour site1

holistics.io1

monday.com1

Nine of the ten domain citations in answers naming Helical Insight came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

basedash.com/blog/best-bi-tools-with-usage-based-pricing-20261

bi4saas.com/articles/embedded-analytics-pricing1

dashboardfox.com/blog/best-bi-tools-small-business1

dashboardfox.com/blog/best-cloud-bi-software1

definite.app/blog/best-bi-tools-for-startups1

embeddable.com/blog/embedded-analytics-pricing-and-benefit-comparison1

fanruan.com/en/blog/bi-dashboard-software-comparison-power-bi-vs-tableau1

getlago.com/blog/enterprise-pricing1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Helical Insight's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Helical Insight, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at helicalinsight.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.