Grouparoo discontinued

Named in 5 judge labels across 1 category by 4 of 6 models in the September 2026 Edition. 0 first choices, 4 negative labels. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-08.5.

Standing

5 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Grouparoo was named 5 times in Warehouse & ETL, where Hightouch led with 40%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Grouparoo. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Vertical	First choices	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Data warehouse and reverse ETL for marketing	GTM data and infrastructure	0%	62 of 62	80%	5	under 10 labels · led by Hightouch at 40%

By model

How each model treated Grouparoo across every prompt where it was named. Six models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Negative	Labels
Claude Opus 5	0	2	2
Claude Opus 4.8	0	0	0
GPT-6 Astra	0	1	1
GPT-5.6 Sol	0	1	1
Gemini 3.1 Pro	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar Pro	1	0	1

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“with Grouparoo and RudderStack also listed in that category” Perplexity Sonar Pro · Warehouse & ETL · negative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“which is no longer an actively developed commercial product. Verify vendor viability” Claude Opus 5 · Warehouse & ETL · comparative prompt · hard negative

“Avoid for a new production deployment, unless you intend to maintain a fork.” GPT-6 Astra · Warehouse & ETL · negative prompt · hard negative

“Treat Grouparoo as legacy; don't start new work on it.” Claude Opus 5 · Warehouse & ETL · negative prompt · hard negative

“avoid Grouparoo for a new implementation” GPT-5.6 Sol · Warehouse & ETL · negative prompt · hard negative

Names read as Grouparoo

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Grouparoo; a claim can dispute any of them.

Every label used the canonical name.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page gets a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Grouparoo, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a logo and one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or quadrants, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. Sponsorship is separate: a sponsor funds categories or buyer dimensions and is named on what it funded, and the rules are the same for every sponsor.