AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › EventMobi Lead Capture · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

EventMobi Lead Capture

7Judge labels
0First choices
1Negative labels
3 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. EventMobi Lead Capture was named 2 times in Event lead capture, where Blinq led with 23%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In event lead capture · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named EventMobi Lead Capture for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Event lead capture appsMarketing0%62 of 7050%2under 10 labels · led by Blinq at 23%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for EventMobi Lead Capture yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated EventMobi Lead Capture across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX01012
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained3 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative7 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best if You Host the Event: EventMobi ... offers a reseller model that can be very cost-effective.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Event lead capture · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Specific Apps with Known Issues ... EventMobi Lead Capture - Lack of offline functionality” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Event lead capture · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as EventMobi Lead Capture, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and EventMobi Lead Capture was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Captello4 of 70Not among the top eight
Cvent LeadCapture3 of 71Not among the top eight
Popl2 of 71Not among the top eight
Blinq2 of 70Not among the top eight
Wave Connect2 of 70Not among the top eight
iCapture2 of 70Not among the top eight
momencio2 of 70Not among the top eight
Cvent iCapture1 of 71Not among the top eight
EventLeadCapture1 of 71Not among the top eight
Leady1 of 71Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named EventMobi Lead Capture. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 7 answers that named EventMobi Lead Capture and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

eventmobi.comYour site5
b2brain.com4
blinq.me3
g2.com3
mobilocard.com3
accelevents.com2
apps.apple.com2
captello.com2
getmobly.com2
gitnux.org2

Twenty-three of the twenty-eight domain citations in answers naming EventMobi Lead Capture came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on eventmobi.com
732
subdomains included
Content
238
counted in the table below
Documentation
281
Product · Integration
0 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog136102026-09-24
Webinar or virtual event3102025-12-02
Conference or event2122026-09-08
Glossary or explainer1622026-09-02
Case study1502025-01-31
News or press1112026-08-10
Comparison302026-03-25
Template or tool312026-07-29
Report or ebook2undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page eventmobi.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as EventMobi Lead Capture

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as EventMobi Lead Capture; a claim can dispute any of them.
EventMobi 1

Follow EventMobi Lead Capture

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when EventMobi Lead Capture's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as EventMobi Lead Capture, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for EventMobi Lead Capture by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where EventMobi Lead Capture is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name EventMobi Lead Capture, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at eventmobi.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.