Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 16 of 85, unchanged
1 category · Named, not rankedCrowdReply
2Judge labels
1First choices
0Negative labels
2 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. CrowdReply was named 2 times in AI visibility, where Otterly led with 20%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market15 of 90
2%2 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In ai visibility · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named CrowdReply for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI visibility and answer engine tracking tools | Marketing | 2% | 15 of 90 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Otterly at 20% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, CrowdReply held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · AI visibility · by segment
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI visibility | 0% | 2% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now. | New this edition | Rank 15 of 90, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated CrowdReply across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated CrowdReply across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 label1
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative2 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Top Recommendation: CrowdReply ... Best for most mid-market B2B teams” MiniMax M2.5 · AI visibility · direct prompt · first choice
“"For most mid-market B2B SaaS teams, CrowdReply is my pick: the only tool here that gets you cited in the sources AI pulls from"” Muse Glimmer 30B · AI visibility · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as CrowdReply, over the 2 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and CrowdReply was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as CrowdReply, over the 2 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and CrowdReply was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named CrowdReply. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 2 answers that named CrowdReply and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
birdeye.com2
crowdreply.ioYour site2
indexly.ai2
ahrefs.com1
airops.com1
analyticsinsight.net1
blog.hubspot.com1
citeme.io1
cognizo.ai1
discoveredlabs.com1
Eleven of the thirteen domain citations in answers naming CrowdReply came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on crowdreply.io
172
subdomains included
Content
13
counted in the table below
Documentation
110
Product · Integration
26 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case study | 6 | 6 | 2026-09-09 | SEO | |
| Glossary or explainer | 4 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 3 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-09AI Visibility Case Study: Lido 0→15% on ChatGPT case study
- 2026-09-09Generative Engine Optimization Case Study: Pabau 6→59% case study
- 2026-09-09Answer Engine Optimization Case Study: TaxDome #1 case study
- 2026-09-09AI Brand Visibility Case Study: Respeecher 47→82% case study
- 2026-09-09LLM SEO Case Study: Stingrai 0→32%, #1 Cited Source case study
- 2026-09-09AI Search Visibility Case Study: SafeGraph 27→75% case study
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page crowdreply.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read October 5, 2026.
Follow CrowdReply
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
CrowdReply is its own company.ShowHide
The company
CrowdReply is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- The #1 AI Search Visibility Tool
- For
- B2B and enterprise brands
- Price stated
- Flexible plans starting at $99/mo crowdreply.io/pricing
- Starting price
- 79 crowdreply.io/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- 7-day free trial crowdreply.io
- Customers named
- OmioLevantainstantlyNP DigitalfacetunewodifyCreatioKamatera
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, certifications, hosting
What CrowdReply's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: crowdreply.io, crowdreply.io/pricing, crowdreply.io/solutions/startups. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when CrowdReply's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as CrowdReply, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for CrowdReply by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where CrowdReply is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name CrowdReply, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.