Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 96 of 150, unchanged
1 category · Named, not rankedCloudera
4Judge labels
0First choices
2Negative labels
4 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Cloudera was named 1 time in DMP, where Segment led with 37%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market105 of 159
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprise147 of 151
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
In dmp · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Cloudera for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data management platforms | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 105 of 159 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Segment at 37% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Cloudera held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · DMP · by segment
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 147 → 133 of 137
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DMP | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 105 of 159, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Cloudera across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Cloudera across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative3 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative4 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
No positive label carried a quote.
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Cloudera, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Cloudera was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Cloudera, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Cloudera was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Cloudera. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 4 answers that named Cloudera and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
cio.com2
g2.com2
improvado.io2
linkedin.com2
matillion.com2
ahhowland.com1
anblicks.com1
atrocore.com1
aws.amazon.com1
bilarna.com1
Fifteen of the fifteen domain citations in answers naming Cloudera came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on cloudera.com
12,184
subdomains included
Content
1,713
counted in the table below
Documentation
164
Product · Integration
78 · 10
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 754 | 8 | 2026-09-18 | ||
| Report or ebook | 290 | 1 | 2026-09-14 | ||
| Case study | 236 | 9 | 2026-09-17 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 201 | 0 | 2026-03-05 | ||
| News or press | 191 | 9 | 2026-09-17 | ||
| Conference or event | 26 | 10 | 2026-09-29 | ||
| Comparison | 6 | 2 | 2026-09-21 | ||
| Template or tool | 4 | 0 | 2026-01-27 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 4 | 4 | 2026-09-17 | ||
| Podcast or video | 1 | 1 | 2026-09-28 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-29Evolve conference or event
- 2026-09-29New york conference or event
- 2026-09-29Agenda conference or event
- 2026-09-28The ai forecast podcast or video
- 2026-09-28Speakers conference or event
- 2026-09-21Self service vs centralized data management how to leverage data lineage to empower and control comparison
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page cloudera.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Cloudera
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Cloudera.ShowHide
The company
Cloudera.
ShowHideOn record
Wikidata- Website
- cloudera.com
- Headquarters
- Palo Alto, United States
- Founded
- 2008
- Ownership
- Public, CLDR on New York Stock Exchange
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · Crunchbase
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- the only hybrid data and AI platform company that brings AI to data anywhere: in clouds, data centers, and at the edge.
- For
- enterprise
- Price stated
- Cloud-native services to secure and manage the data lifecycle in any cloud or data center. cloudera.com/products/pricing.html
- Starting price
- $0.04/CCU cloudera.com/products/pricing.html
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type IICCPACyber EssentialsCyber Essentials PlusGDPRPCISecure by Design PledgeISO 27001:2022
- Hosting
- United StatesGermanyAustraliaCustomer selectedNetherlandsAWSAzureGCP
- Customers named
- Regions BankVodafone IdeaTelkomselBank of MontrealHealthesystems
- Not stated on the pages read
- Free plan or trial, integrations
What Cloudera's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: cloudera.com, trust.cloudera.com, cloudera.com/products/pricing.html. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Cloudera's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Cloudera, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Cloudera by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Cloudera is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Cloudera, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.